Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JCbot
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was
Request Expired.
Operator: –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): AutoWikiBrowser
Function Overview: The bot will run simple and regex find/replace tasks for Wikipedia:WikiProject Topic outline and any other articles that need it.
Edit period(s): Whenever it's needed, most likely no more than once every few days
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Various repetitive find/replace tasks for the pages listed here. Mostly minor stuff, such as changing links; an example of this can be seen here.
Discussion
[edit]This is my first BRFA, so bear with me, and sorry if I screwed anything up too badly... –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please specify specific tasks, don't say "It'll do stuff" since there's no way for us or anybody else providing feedback to generate consensus if we don't know what it does. Q T C 16:04, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You managed to file a BRFA correctly though, so kudos for that. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Simple, uncontroversial task, but it's best to ensure that there are no gremlins in the code! Richard0612 20:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- On hold for a while, operator request. No need to expire this brfa. ST47 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Any updates? – Quadell (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- On hold for a while, operator request. No need to expire this brfa. ST47 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) – Quadell (talk) 23:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's best to expire this, as I'm more or less stuck. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Request Expired. – Quadell (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.