Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/H3llBot 2b
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Approved.
Operator: Hellknowz (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 13:49, Monday April 2, 2012 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): C#
Source code available: N
Function overview: Expand on original task: tag citations with dead links with |deadurl=yes
, where archive params |archiveurl=
or |archivedate=
are already set with |deadurl=no
.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Main BRFA, deadurl RfC. More on main task here, or see recent contribs.
Edit period(s): This task -- a couple dozen times a day probably, main task would far exceed in frequency.
Estimated number of pages affected: may be 1-5% of edited pages.
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function details:
- Tag citations with dead links with
|deadurl=yes
, where archive params|archiveurl=
or|archivedate=
are already set with|deadurl=no
, indicating preemptive archiving. If|deadurl=
isn't set, or another value is set, the citation is ignored and assumed to be dead and archived. Example:
{{Cite web |url=http://www.imadeadlink.com |title=Some cool site |archiveurl=http://www.iarchiveinternet.com/http://www.imadeadlink.com |deadurl=no |archivedate=May 10, 2010}}
- ↓
{{Cite web |url=http://www.imadeadlink.com |title=Some cool site |archiveurl=http://www.iarchiveinternet.com/http://www.imadeadlink.com |deadurl=yes <!--Set by H3llBot--> |archivedate=May 10, 2010}}
- "Some cool site". Archived from the original on May 10, 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) → "Some cool site". Archived from the original on May 10, 2010.{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help)
I add <!--Set by H3llBot-->
, like I do with |archiveurl=
and {{dead link}}, so it is clear a bot process determined the link is now dead. Alternatively, I can either skip the comment or remove the field altogether, which would default to link being dead behavior. But this would leave no trace that a bot decided the link is dead.
Discussion
[edit]This is a pretty bureaucratic request, and is a small expansion to the existing task. But I like my BRFAs tidy and I feel like I should file this regardless, in case there are some issues someone can think of and I'm not caught implementing undocumented additions. :) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't see any problems. Common-ish task which is pretty straightforward. Yep. Rcsprinter (Gimme a message) 13:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's occurred to me that this is (surprisingly) more complicated than it appears on first impression. See User talk:Dispenser/Checklinks#Ignore list, User talk:Dispenser/Checklinks#FYI Observation - templates and external links, User talk:Dispenser/Checklinks#URLs with user+password... screw it, just read the whole talk page. Also Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DumZiBoT. Basically, at the very least, just a URL failing once doesn't mean it's dead. And failing doesn't mean you checked it right. Josh Parris 22:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is, but I haven't listed my logic for the main task (detecting dead links), because it is already approved: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/H3llBot 2. You can read the updated logic here: User:H3llBot/ADL. You can see the bot's contributions. You can also refer to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BlevintronBot, where I basically mentioned everything I can about detecting dead links. I have ignore lists, I don't bother with ftp:// or media, I double-check within 3 days, I have strict detect-404-only rules, etc. As I said, this is just adding a little markup logic to the task to handle the new
|deadurl=
, which didn't exist when I first filed the BRFA. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:11, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Ah, I see I've completely missed the point. Josh Parris 10:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It is, but I haven't listed my logic for the main task (detecting dead links), because it is already approved: Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/H3llBot 2. You can read the updated logic here: User:H3llBot/ADL. You can see the bot's contributions. You can also refer to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BlevintronBot, where I basically mentioned everything I can about detecting dead links. I have ignore lists, I don't bother with ftp:// or media, I double-check within 3 days, I have strict detect-404-only rules, etc. As I said, this is just adding a little markup logic to the task to handle the new
An obvious addition to functionality. Approved. Josh Parris 10:16, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.