Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chris G Bot (task 3)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operator: Chris  G 

Automatic or Manually Assisted:

Programming Language(s):PHP for simple web requests, Perl (using Perlwikipedia) for more complex requests

Function Summary:Removing/Replacing and Substing templates that will be deleted

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Run by users and me(for complex requests) when needed, a few runs a day?

Edit rate requested: X edits per TIME Not sure at the moment, PHP script has a 5 sec dealy between server requests(can set it higher if you want)

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):Y

Function Details:Basically the script gets all the what links here pages and goes through each page and subst/removes/replaces the template as necessary, I will write up a perl script for more complex requests(e.g. where template params have to be changed(for more info see here)

Discussion

[edit]

Is there a particular reason why you feel Wikipedia:AWB isn't up to the task? — Coren (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That, and you can do it out of the box. Saves you having to code them... Reedy Boy 18:32, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like using Windows when I'm fine with Linux and I have more controll with perl and PHP. --Chris  G  08:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair 'nuf (and I empathize). Find-and replace of templates can be funky when parameters are involved. Would you mind showing us the regexes you will use? — Coren (talk) 00:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You will be giving the final go-ahead on each subtask, yes? This has not been clarified. — madman bum and angel 19:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I worded that badly, basically there will be a php script on the toolserver which users can use to make simple requests which I will check before running on the perl script. --Chris 09:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is my current understanding of your bot request:

  • Users would be able to use a PHP script to submit request for template replacements;
  • Those requests would be used to generate regexes (automatically? by yourself?) to perform the replacement;
  • You would vet the request;
  • An unattended task would apply the regexes to the list of pages scraped from the appropriate "what links here".

Is this correct? — Coren (talk) 23:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} Yes that is correct, I will do the regexes myself to avoid any stuff up. --Chris 08:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag.How will you handle nested templates? MaxSem(Han shot first!) 18:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by operator. having troubling finding the time to work on code and such, not really feeling that motivated by this bot. --Chris 10:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]