Jump to content

Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates/Requests/April 2007/John Hill

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Case Filed On: 23:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:

Questions:[edit]

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer: Yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: all the above plus outright distortion of information, false "quotes," misleading comments, confusion of legendary and factual material, racial supremacist propaganda, lack of neutral point of view, etc. Please have a read of the Talk pages (and Archives) - this should make it plain how this page (and other related ones) is being hijacked by people who are promoting an elitist, racist point of view.

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer: Just many discussions on the Jat Talk page over many months and adding "dispute" tags that have always been deleted.

What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer: Some help to make the article on Jats accurate and worthy of the Wikipedia

Summary:[edit]

Discussion:[edit]

Followup:[edit]

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information[edit]

Case Status: pending


Advocate Status:

May not be for the AMA. Editors Assistance may be able to take this one (more than likely better suited to helping out in this type of issue.) Æon Insanity Now! Give Back Our Membership! 04:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]