Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neopolitan Business Park

Neopolitan Business Park

Neopolitan Business Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. no assertion of notability Widefox (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Reasons for deletion

Main page: Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Reasons for deletion include, but are not limited to, the following (subject to the condition that improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page):

• Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject)

→This article is about an advertisement but is not advertising

Kj plma (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

A business park is not an advertising subject, no. Also the objection is not the advert but there is no indication of notability. Widefox (talk) 10:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - I can find no coverage about this business park in reliable sources. Al I can find are some rel estate listings. -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

• What happened to the page?

Kj plma (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - I am sorry for any inconsistency but I am now nominating this article for deletion because someone had done great vandalism on the page.

Kj plma (talk) 05:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

• Delete - Because this article is filled with poop!!! I AM THE KING OF THE FROGS!!! A SOCK PUPPET OF CLARENCE!!!

LIST OF THE MONKEYS THAT ARE POOPS AND ARE BEST TO BE FLUSHED IN THE TOILET!!!

• Kj plma
• talk
• talk

Clarence Baladjay 15 (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2012 (UTC)