Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medo Abowarda: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
del |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' - There is no coverage in reliable sources for this person. Also searching for this company and the software turned up nothing either. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 14:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - There is no coverage in reliable sources for this person. Also searching for this company and the software turned up nothing either. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 14:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
test |
|||
Revision as of 14:40, 1 September 2011
- Medo Abowarda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:PROD. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Googling turns up nothing useful. Article appears to be autobiographical WP:AUTO WP:SPA WP:COI. Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION. Msnicki (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All of the references are from the company website, which doesn't have an article either. -- Luke (Talk) 20:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - There is no coverage in reliable sources for this person. Also searching for this company and the software turned up nothing either. -- Whpq (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
test