Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterina Korbut: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
fucking delete this motherfucking bullshit |
(edit summary removed) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep''' She was listed in Wikiproject Chess's most wanted articles before it was created. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher|talk]]) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' She was listed in Wikiproject Chess's most wanted articles before it was created. [[User:PatGallacher|PatGallacher]] ([[User talk:PatGallacher|talk]]) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Certainly notable within the context of the chess world. Not many women hold the full [[International Master]] title. [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]] ([[User talk:MaxBrowne|talk]]) 01:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Certainly notable within the context of the chess world. Not many women hold the full [[International Master]] title. [[User:MaxBrowne|MaxBrowne]] ([[User talk:MaxBrowne|talk]]) 01:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
:'''Comment.''' You're an idiot. This is Wikipedia, where we have standards about what gets included. This is not "the chess world." If you are that fucking worried about obscure fucking chess players being featured in wiki then fucking go start your own fucking Chess wiki, you fuck. [[User:TreeGrowsinBrooklyn|TreeGrowsinBrooklyn]] ([[User talk:TreeGrowsinBrooklyn|talk]]) 21:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' per all arguments given above. [[User:Cobblet|Cobblet]] ([[User talk:Cobblet|talk]]) 01:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' per all arguments given above. [[User:Cobblet|Cobblet]] ([[User talk:Cobblet|talk]]) 01:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' Some very distinguished achievements. [[User:Brittle heaven|Brittle heaven]] ([[User talk:Brittle heaven|talk]]) 02:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' Some very distinguished achievements. [[User:Brittle heaven|Brittle heaven]] ([[User talk:Brittle heaven|talk]]) 02:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:27, 31 January 2014
- Ekaterina Korbut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:GNG. ColonelHenry (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:GNG? She fails this? She only just meets this? C'mon, you know better than that. Her bio states she has won the World Junior Chess Championship and the Russian women's championship, so she should meet the notabilty standards of WP:ANYBIO. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Russian 2006 champ and world championship competitor - either would be enough. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Why is this nominated for deletion? MrsHudson (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep She was listed in Wikiproject Chess's most wanted articles before it was created. PatGallacher (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Certainly notable within the context of the chess world. Not many women hold the full International Master title. MaxBrowne (talk) 01:30, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. You're an idiot. This is Wikipedia, where we have standards about what gets included. This is not "the chess world." If you are that fucking worried about obscure fucking chess players being featured in wiki then fucking go start your own fucking Chess wiki, you fuck. TreeGrowsinBrooklyn (talk) 21:27, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep per all arguments given above. Cobblet (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Some very distinguished achievements. Brittle heaven (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep As a non-chess person, I (never-the-less) find this person of interest. I also hope her activities can be updated in the article. What has she done since 2008? Kdammers (talk) 04:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly fails GNG. Where is the substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources? There is none. She is not even a grandmaster. She's a WGM, which is the chess equivalent of being the smartest kid in retard class. Those "voting" keep are clearly on another planent. Chess geeks need to get their head out of their asses and realize that while they might think an article is cool, or they "like it" that does not mean the wider world of reliable sources gives a flying fuck about the article. Rule of Thumb: if its not written about in reliable worldwide sources, that mean's ITS NOT FUCKING IMPORTANT and therefore it doesn't need to have an article here, no matter how much you chess idiots think it should. Jesus Christ. Delete. TreeGrowsinBrooklyn (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)