User talk:Zzcn

August 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Sesame oil, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Zefr (talk) 22:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sorry I am new to wikipedia. I found lots of errors regarding Chinese food and ingredients, which I am passionated about. Can I add them without the citations then? Zzcn (talk) 22:11, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And I don't understand why some of the citations are allowed? Like this link:

Sichuan pepper

redspicehouse.com put two citations and they are allowed? Zzcn (talk) 22:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three, actually--I removed them. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 22:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zzcn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia. I don't know how I can contribute to the articles. I saw all other pages with citations for the source of the information.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 22:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The user added three links, all to https://cookingwithlei.com -- that's spam. Drmies (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]