User talk:Zulu roger

Zulu roger, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zulu roger! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Michael Lewis Goguen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Michael Lewis Goguen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 04:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Lewis Goguen (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No indication of notability or encyclopedic content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 02:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen

Hello, Zulu roger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Lewis Goguen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation: Michael Goguen

Hello, Zulu roger. You have new messages at Talk:Michael Goguen.
Message added 1 December 2022. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blackandyellow412 (talk) 15:04, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Discussion invitation (Michael Goguen)

Hello, Zulu roger. You have new messages at Talk:Michael Goguen.
Message added 8 December 2022. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blackandyellow412 (talk) 14:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree that we need to find a compromise. There needs to be balanced information not just things portraying the subject in a positive light and focusing negative attention on his enemies. He has earned a tarnished reputation by doing questionable things over the years. What do you propose? Zulu roger (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zulu roger please continue the discussion on Talk:Michael Goguen Blackandyellow412 (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Zulu roger I wanted to remind you to continue our discussion on Talk:Michael Goguen to reduce the number of quotes and determine what content should be paraphrased. Blackandyellow412 (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]