User talk:Zorozro

Zorozro, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zorozro! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aalaan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Fazlur Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --McGeddon (talk) 15:44, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm Twsx. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Fazlur Khan, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 15:58, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Aalaan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zorozro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I added good information with good pictures. authentic sources were provided

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The quality of your edits wasn't really a factor. The primary factor for your block was that it became clear that you are a previously-blocked user who is attempting to edit Wikipedia in spite of that previous block. Thus, any edit from this account is not allowed, regardless of the sourcing, pictures, or information.

The secondary factor for the block is that, even if the pattern of abuse wasn't there, you had broken the three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read

Here's what you need to do:

Stop editing Wikipedia for at least six months
After that period is up, request an unblock from your original account with a promise never to sock again
If you are unblocked, discuss your proposed changes on talk pages and get consensus before making them.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]