User talk:Zooguide

Welcome!

Hello, Zooguide, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ErikHaugen (talk) 09:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Catherine Van der Stricht

A tag has been placed on Catherine Van der Stricht requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GILO ^{ACCIDENT &}_EMERGENCY 09:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Van der Stricht

The article Catherine Van der Stricht has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac16888 ^Talk 14:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Catherine Van der Stricht. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Jac16888 ^Talk 14:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jac16888 ^Talk 15:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Catherine Van der Stricht, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kudpung (talk) 06:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catherine Van der Stricht

The article Catherine Van der Stricht has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails WP:POLITICIAN, no third-party references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lord Pistachio ^talk 14:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Catherine Van der Stricht

A tag has been placed on Catherine Van der Stricht, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Kudpung (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Catherine Van der Stricht, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Recreation of previously speedy deleted page Kudpung (talk) 15:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]