User talk:Znm98
This user is a student editor in The_George_Washington_University/Research,_Authoring,_and_Audience_in_the_Age_of_New_Media_(Spring_2018) . |
Znm98, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Znm98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 15:45, 22 March 2018 (UTC) |
Introducing myself
[edit]- Hi! This is Emily Kim in your UW 1020 Class. I am a Freshman studying Exercise Science and in Milken School of Public Health. I hope you have a good weekend!--Emkim123 (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]Hi! Here are my notes:
- Be careful of terms like "so-called". Words like these are seen as fairly loaded terms since they tend to carry various assumptions or feelings with them. For example, the word so-called can have negative connotations and is often used to denigrate someone or something.
- Studies should be used carefully, as they're seen as primary sources for the research they created. Even if they're published in a reputable journal, all the journal does is make sure the study isn't filled with errors or is obviously false. Coverage from a secondary source helps show that the claims are legitimate and also helps show why it should be highlighted over other studies. Something to also consider is that studies only survey a portion of an audience and as such, any claims are really only relevant to the study participants. Results can change dramatically depending on who is surveyed and how the study is conducted - for example, this was done online so it stands to reason that more of their participants would rely on social media and microblogs - one that's conducted by phone or paper may produce different results. With this, all you need to do is specify that it was the surveyed recipients that responded in this way, like "A 2014 study conducted of journalists in the United States found that 40% of the participants...".
- That said, if the study you're referencing is one that was mentioned in a secondary source, that's fine - the above information is for when you're pulling the info directly from the study itself.
- Can you rephrase the sentence "With these changes occurring, credibility ratings for mainstream news outlets has reached an all-time low" to attribute it to a specific person or source?
Overall this is very good so far and I think that the information you're adding is really interesting! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Znm98, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2018 (UTC)