User talk:Zigani
Turkish Roma
[edit]Hello. I've reverted your page move. It's likely to be controversial and should be discussed, and certainly not moved without an explanation. See WP:MOVE. Largoplazo (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw it. Why is the word Gypsy allowed in this article? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Hungarian_Slovak_Gypsies_in_the_United_States
- Suddenly to name all peripatetic groups Roma, but who do not call themselves Roma at all, is very questionable. The word Gypsy would be better in that case, since it also corresponds to the translations in other languages. It has become fashion that the word Gypsy is immediately a slure. This is a phenomenon.
About Turkish Gypsys:
http://www.errc.org/roma-rights-journal/the-perception-of-gypsies-in-turkish-society
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0362331906000486
https://propermusic.com/products/ahmetkusgozensemble-turkishgypsymusic
https://cingeneyizenglish.blogspot.com/p/i-am-gypsy.html
https://istanbultarihi.ist/472-the-gypsies-of-istanbul
https://www.amazon.de/Turkish-Gypsy-Music-Ahmet-Kusgoz/dp/B002IW62B4
Zigani (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nalanidil per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nalanidil. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.