User talk:Zhmurcha

Welcome!

Hello, Zhmurcha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 15:49, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 2

Be careful of your spelling: zoophilic not zoophillic. The fungus doesn't fluoresce under green light, it fluoresces green under UV light. I suggest you don't include treatment guidelines because these can change; however it may be worth including a general statement on its susceptibility resistance various antifungal agents. Long-haired kittens are often asymptomatic - I'm not sure I learned this from but perhaps you can find a reference. It explains why many outbreaks of tinea capitis in children often trace their roots to the recent acquisition of an apparently healthy kitten. Can you find any information based on the analysis of the recent sequenced genome (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/Micca1/Micca1.home.html)? This kind of analysis often yields many interesting findings. Medmyco (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assignment 3-Peer review

Hi, nice job on your paragraphs. It is really nice that you have lots of information outlined. I understand that you are still working on it, so maybe you just want have subtitle for now. But just in case you did not notice, I think it would a good idea to make the major header text a bigger front by using double equation mark, and maybe use the triple equation mark for sub-header. Also, I think it would be a good idea to have a section that discuss pathophysiology of this fungus since it involves infections with pets and children. Is there any case studies involved? C2zhaobi (talk) 00:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will take into consideration :) Zhmurcha (talk) 15:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Review

Hey great job on your article. You have included a lot of interesting facts, especially on distribution and where it peaks. You are probably in the process of fixing it, but just make sure to convert all your points into paragraphs. Also, perhaps include some facts about the origin of Microsporum canis (where it was first discovered and which species it may have evolved from). This article may be able to provide some useful information: Population structure and evolutionary origins of Microsporum canis, M. ferrugineum and M. audouinii.. I hope this helps and I look forward to reading your finished article. Waleed Shahid1 (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! I will look into that article Zhmurcha (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Microsporum canis instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Zhmurcha/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Zhmurcha, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Zhmurcha/sandbox

Hello, Zhmurcha. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]