User talk:Zheeeh

July 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zheeeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing what I believe to be an unjust block. Neither this nor account nor myself is a sockpuppet, and I have in no way participated in sockpupetry. This Wikipedia account is the only one I have ever used, and I am unsure why it was blocked. I am by no means a professional or even regularly active editor on the site (I am only just returning to the account after several months), so this seems even more strange that I would be suspected of this. My best guess is that it is related to an article I attempted to expand some months ago. Looking back at the link, it appears that after it was created, it was deemed unnecessary and deleted, then recreated, deleted, and so on several times. I had no part in the attempted recreation of the article, and I believe I did not pursue anything further with it after the first deletion. I may have submitted an appeal on the removal (memory fails me), but this would have been the extent. I in no way attempted to circumvent its deletion via sockpuppetry. Thank you for your time, and happy holidays.

Decline reason:

Based on what I see(which I don't wish to reveal) I believe the reason for the block is correct. Perhaps this is your only account, but that would only make this meat puppetry. 331dot (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zheeeh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am unsure of your unrevealed reasons, but I will reaffirm that I did not engage in neither sockpuppetry nor meatpuppetry. This is my only account and I came here by my own volition. I believe that it is true that I created my account right before I attempted to create and edit the previously mentioned article which was deleted, and this may be why it seems as if I was directed here in order to work on said article. But this is not true, and I was not influenced by any individuals or groups. My account creation and attempted edits came from a personal and genuine interest in the subject -- a subject that I believed was fit for Wikipedia. It has since been deemed that it is not fit for the site (which you've likely noted), and I do not intend to oppose this decision. However, I still believe my block is unjust and I would like to re-appeal. As mentioned, I do not know what hidden tools you have to investigate this, so it may come down to just word acting as a voucher, however I can guarantee you that my actions are personal to myself and do not stem from external influence. Thank you for your time.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am unsure of your unrevealed reasons, but I will reaffirm that I did not engage in neither sockpuppetry nor meatpuppetry. This is my only account and I came here by my own volition. I believe that it is true that I created my account right before I attempted to create and edit the previously mentioned article which was deleted, and this may be why it seems as if I was directed here in order to work on said article. But this is not true, and I was not influenced by any individuals or groups. My account creation and attempted edits came from a personal and genuine interest in the subject -- a subject that I believed was fit for Wikipedia. It has since been deemed that it is not fit for the site (which you've likely noted), and I do not intend to oppose this decision. However, I still believe my block is unjust and I would like to re-appeal. As mentioned, I do not know what hidden tools you have to investigate this, so it may come down to just word acting as a voucher, however I can guarantee you that my actions are personal to myself and do not stem from external influence. Thank you for your time. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am unsure of your unrevealed reasons, but I will reaffirm that I did not engage in neither sockpuppetry nor meatpuppetry. This is my only account and I came here by my own volition. I believe that it is true that I created my account right before I attempted to create and edit the previously mentioned article which was deleted, and this may be why it seems as if I was directed here in order to work on said article. But this is not true, and I was not influenced by any individuals or groups. My account creation and attempted edits came from a personal and genuine interest in the subject -- a subject that I believed was fit for Wikipedia. It has since been deemed that it is not fit for the site (which you've likely noted), and I do not intend to oppose this decision. However, I still believe my block is unjust and I would like to re-appeal. As mentioned, I do not know what hidden tools you have to investigate this, so it may come down to just word acting as a voucher, however I can guarantee you that my actions are personal to myself and do not stem from external influence. Thank you for your time. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am unsure of your unrevealed reasons, but I will reaffirm that I did not engage in neither sockpuppetry nor meatpuppetry. This is my only account and I came here by my own volition. I believe that it is true that I created my account right before I attempted to create and edit the previously mentioned article which was deleted, and this may be why it seems as if I was directed here in order to work on said article. But this is not true, and I was not influenced by any individuals or groups. My account creation and attempted edits came from a personal and genuine interest in the subject -- a subject that I believed was fit for Wikipedia. It has since been deemed that it is not fit for the site (which you've likely noted), and I do not intend to oppose this decision. However, I still believe my block is unjust and I would like to re-appeal. As mentioned, I do not know what hidden tools you have to investigate this, so it may come down to just word acting as a voucher, however I can guarantee you that my actions are personal to myself and do not stem from external influence. Thank you for your time. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Someone else will review your request; if you intend to abandon efforts to edit about Ironland, please tell what edits you will make instead. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]