User talk:ZetaLady2

Welcome!

Hello, ZetaLady2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove properly cited text without explanation

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Zeta Phi Beta. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

The recent edit you made to Zeta Phi Beta constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 02:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Zeta Phi Beta. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. --Merry Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 02:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Zeta Phi Beta. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 02:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi, ZetaLady2. I noticed that your edits to Zeta Phi Beta related articles constitutes a conflict of interest. I also noticed that you were blanking parts of the controversy section in the Zeta Phi Beta article. If you have any issues related to the section, please discuss the article's section on the talk page. Thanks. miranda 04:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About the controversies section

The lawsuits mentioned in the Zeta Phi Beta article are sourced back to independent news articles. This means the information contained in them is verifiable against that independent reporting. (It also means the suits have been talked about outside of the sorority, so they are fair game for inclusion in the article.)

If the information is out of date, please furnish updated sources with the new information. My suggestion would be to start a new discussion section on Talk:Zeta Phi Beta with links to the updated information.

By just deleting the controversies section with no edit summary to explain what you did, you have caused the appearance that you are deleting the section to make the sorority look better (which other editors have attempted to do in the past). —C.Fred (talk) 17:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]