User talk:Zeroparallax
potential
[edit]Hello, I read quickly your paper about how to derive gravitomagnetism, and while reading the part that talk about electromagnetism, I have been very astonished by the inclusion of a term related to the displacement current in electric potential. I also never saw the magnetic part written like that. It is only my fifth year of studies (and I am French, hence the bad English I am using), I just know about that http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Electromagnetic_potential, do you have other references that include the term you wrote? Have a good day.Klinfran (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Klinfran, I'm a bit busy right now preparing for an oral exam, but here's an answer for now. (Since I now know that someone is actually interested in this paper, I'll be sure to write an introduction to the paper after the exam!) I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, but I assume you mean equations (6) and (7) in the paper. The general idea (and probably these exact equations themselves) can be found in David Griffiths' Introduction to Electrodynamics (http://www.amazon.com/dp/013805326X). Equation (6) is this:
.
- This equation can be obtained if you take the local, differential Gauss law of the Maxwell equations
- ,
- split the charge density into it's "free" and polarization/"bound" parts,
- ,
- and substitute in the potentials expression for the electric field,
- .
- The same ideas apply for equation 7, where there is a "free" current, a magnetization current , and a polarization or "displacement" current . Zeroparallax (talk) 18:08, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ok thanks a lot, that was pretty simple, yes I was talking about that, good luck for your oral, and sorry for the late.Klinfran (talk) 20:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Star article
[edit]Hello RJHall! Is this the best venue to discuss my edit that was removed? The note saying that "the lead is meant to be a summary of the article" implies that if I add my material to the body of the article as well, it should be okay in the lead/intro. Is that correct? Zeroparallax (talk) 00:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Zeroparallax. We can discuss it here or in the article talk page, as you prefer. In general, based upon interpretation of the policy in WP:LEAD, the lead is meant to be a high level summary of the important parts of the article. No offense, but your addition didn't really strike me as a critical addition; it just seemed an unsourced statement of the obvious. It could probably be added to the body without anybody objecting, but personally I'm a little dubious about the need to put it in the lead. Perhaps we need to hash this out further on the article talk page? Thank you.—RJH (talk) 00:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
March 2018
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:You Were There (disambiguation), from its old location at User:Zeroparallax/You Were There (disambiguation). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:You Were There (Michael Jackson song)
[edit]Hello, Zeroparallax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "You Were There".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 14:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:You Were There (Michael Jackson song)
[edit]Hello, Zeroparallax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "You Were There".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 15:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Courtesy notice - discretionary sanctions
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Ronz (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:You Were There (Michael Jackson song), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:You Were There (Michael Jackson song)
[edit]Hello, Zeroparallax. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "You Were There".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)