User talk:ZeroAccend
Could you take it easy on destroying the list? I would apprieciate if you would discuss such large changes first. The main one being that games via PSN are not PSP games. The name of the page is not List of PSP UMD games, so there is no reason why they shouldn't be on there. If you do know a reason please let me know. The list also does not include JP only games, as this is the English wiki, so there is no reason for that to be on there. And for Off Road, you should also remember that this is not only the NA wiki, but the EN wiki, and even though I happen to be in NA, I made the list conform to the way that games are listed on their own pages. I will wait for today on reverting your edits, but please respond ASAP. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 12:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. Well we definitely have different points of view. Do you mind if we come to a solution before we make any more major edits? And as you said that I'm trying to make the list my way, it could be argued that you are now doing the same.
- As far as games that are not on UMD, there is a difference between games that are emulated through some third-party application, and ones that have been release for the PSP through PlayStation, whether or not the game is different. They are still games that have been officially released from PlayStation.
- As for naming, if alternate names do get added, I think it should only include other English titles, and instead of another column, just be under the current title. For example:
Primary Title
Secondary Title
- The reasons I don't think JP only games should be added are 1)that as I said before, this is the English wiki, but I can see your point, although I don't think tha majority of people on this wiki play JP games. But even more so, 2)that it is very hard to find reliable sources for all of the columns. I was planning on nominating this List for FL status once I was done going through it within the next couple days, but with information missing or unreliable, I don't think it would pass.
- Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate you being reasonable, many users are not. I think having better identification is a good solution. The only problem I have about adding another column is that I think it would be a waste of horizontal space, which is very valuable, for something that would be the same for 99% of the list. I like the (PSN) idea, or we could format the title differently, possible a different color, or bold, something that would be explained as you said at the top of the page. Ans as for the rest of the PS1 library that has not been release on PSN yet, it should be included as soon as it is released. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
- Could you just copy what you have to a subpage that we could both work on? Something like User:ZeroAccend/List of PlayStation Portable games. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I went ahead and changed the ** to (PSN), which I think is more explanatory if someone did not notice the note at the top of the page. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Could you just copy what you have to a subpage that we could both work on? Something like User:ZeroAccend/List of PlayStation Portable games. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate you being reasonable, many users are not. I think having better identification is a good solution. The only problem I have about adding another column is that I think it would be a waste of horizontal space, which is very valuable, for something that would be the same for 99% of the list. I like the (PSN) idea, or we could format the title differently, possible a different color, or bold, something that would be explained as you said at the top of the page. Ans as for the rest of the PS1 library that has not been release on PSN yet, it should be included as soon as it is released. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Rayman PS1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Rayman PS1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
