User talk:Zea.asf

Welcome

Hello Zea.asf, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Zea.asf, good luck, and have fun. --Epeefleche (talk) 07:57, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try and advertise

Greetings, saw your edits to tafsir and wanted to note that Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising, including other information websites. If you feel your site, or some other site, is a useful adjunct to a given article, you can add it in the "External links" section, but a full paragraph praising a site in a subjective manner really doesn't work. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of 500

Could you please stop adding the list of 500 influential people? It has been compiled by two institutions, neither of which have articles themselves on Wikipedia and therefore it is fairly safe to assume that their list is not notable. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 05:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think that the list is notable enough to warrant a mention, please explain why you think so. You can reply here on your talk page, since that's a centralized location. —C.Fred (talk) 04:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]