User talk:Ze-wee-mon

Welcome!

Hello, Ze-wee-mon, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Ze-wee-mon, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Py16 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Py16. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ze-wee-mon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, definitely not Py16 and I'm not sure how to appeal against this. :I've nothing to do with: :- abusing multiple accounts, :- Py16, or :- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Py16. :You're correct in SUSPECTING something but your suspicion is INCORRECT. :I've been logging in every other day or every couple of days to contribute to articles about my favourite and mostly followed Australian footballers from the 1987 to 1991 generation, I'd love to get back to editing those articles soon. I MAY infact have an addictive obsession with my favourite Greek-Australian footballers like Govas, Bouzanis, Giannou, Stambolziev, but not really sure how that makes me another user or an abuser of multiple accounts. :Since I'd already created my own User Page which indicated I'm Melbourne-born to Greek folks, a Pana fan and follow Aussies Abroad, Oz Football and predominantly edited Greek-Australian footballers abroad, this should ethically and not suspiciously be interpreted for my editing to Melbourne Victory and the club's latest Paraguayan signing, regardless of if my edits may or may not be linked through secondary or tertiary hyperlinks to a page or pages that Py16 created or edited and that shouldn't be interpreted from a stance that I'm using another account or an abuser of multiple accounts. :Thanks :) Ze-wee-mon (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"You're correct in SUSPECTING something but your suspicion is INCORRECT", you say. Well, that's a strange way to say it. If we are right in suspecting something, but it's not you, then maybe you can help us with what we do suspect? You would seem to know more than we do.

And apart from that, what you have admitted to isn't exactly a broadly shared interest. So, when several different accounts make very similar edits in this particularly narrow area, pray tell, what are we supposed to think? — Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ze-wee-mon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello again Daniel Case (talk). Look, I truly acknowledge if you're experienced, and I don't doubt that you would be, in the area of identifying and blocking editors who vandalize or use multiple accounts, I really do understand this, but I can sincerely and only say once more that I've nothing to do with the suspicions you claim. Any other person who doesn't take editing seriously would've said all of the names under the sun to you and thrown a tantrum, I on the other hand know that it MAY in fact just be margin of error, cause margin of error does happen and it's no big deal. Go ahead please and check my IP address and also check the IP address of the other accounts if it causes assurance. I've already prepared other info to be edited into the pages of Greek-Australian footballers and I was looking forward to expanding Dimitri Hatzimouratis, a draft I created, but it was unfortunately removed. Hope you can lift the blockage. Thanks :) Ze-wee-mon (talk) 23:53, 15 February 2023

Decline reason:

This boils down to "I'm not a sock", which is insufficient to remove a block for socking, as every sock claims to not be one. Not throwing a tantrum is a point in your favor I guess, but not a reason to remove the block. This could be meat puppetry, which is treated the same. It could help if you agreed to abandon editing about footballers for the time being and tell us what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.