User talk:Zdravko mk

Welcome!

Hello Zdravko mk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Deckiller 13:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Praxis

Hi Zdravko...Just wanted to say that I am very pleased witht he way that the Praxis school articles are developing and to thank you for collaborating with me on this project. If you know anybody else who would be interested in colaborating, please get them involved. Cheers and look forward to continuing to develop this area of Wikipedia with you. Pozdrav, --Bora Nesic 04:14, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the See Also section, I agree, we should delete it. I have located the entire collection of Praxis journals at the U of T library, but due to the intense schedule with midterms haven't been able to turn any of the stuff into a soft copy. Will let you know as soon as I can do so.--Bora Nesic 13:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been missing from any major action on wikipedia for a while as it's exam time, but my thinking is that the next thing that the Praxis School article is a good summary of criticism leveled against the Praxis philosophers, in particular those that did not come from the Government, but from more liberally oriented thinkers. I think that a good start to this end is the NIN article you found about Praxis group where a few philosophers including Mile Savic (a Heidegger scholar from Belgrade) wage an attack on Praxis school as Leninism in disguise. Unfortunately I probably won't get to this until the third week of March, but I thought I'd share some creative input as you are fairly active on these pages.--Bora Nesic 14:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Grlic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grlic.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

3RR

You are in danger in violating Wikipedia:3RR on Nikola Karev. You might be temporarily blocked from further editing. /FunkyFly.talk_ 16:31, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are also in danger in violating Wikipedia:3RR on Lazar Kolisevski. You might be temporarily blocked from further editing. /FunkyFly.talk_ 16:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on June 2 2006 (UTC) to Lazar Koliševski

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 22:11, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your mail... I don't think FF has broken 3RR William M. Connolley 07:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your other mail... its better to talk here. And no, I'm not going to get involved in the content William M. Connolley 17:49, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[2] made on June 5 2006 (UTC) to Nikola Karev

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 13:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re your mail (btw, did you know you can edit this page when blocked?): its fairly simple, for 3RR: you get blocked for breaking it and not-blocked for not breaking it William M. Connolley 15:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FunkyFly has also broken the rule and you haven't blocked him. Please, you don't need to explain me anymore. I have told you what is the situation. If you think that it is enough to block someone without seeing his edits and the discussion page, than it is beyond my reach. Probably being an administrator means some responsibility to do that, but, yes, you can block everybody whom you are formally told that has broken the 3RR rule, no matter if he, and not the other side, was trying to be constructive and to find a compromise. It's OK, Mr. Connolley, side with the stronger and don't give a demn about the quality of the Wikipedia (Zdravko mk 16:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I've told you: if you think FF has broken 3RR, report him. Since you can't at the moment, list them here William M. Connolley 16:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The real problem is not blocking someone. There is a need for outside help for the article Nikola Karev, and please see the edits. There can you see that I am trying to be constructive and the other side is not doing that. They are working in a coalition against me to go around the 3RR rule. But OK, if you think it is appropriate, I report FunkyFly for breaking the 3RR rule on Nikola Karev. After the possible sanction, he and his fellows will come back and will insist on their, I must say nationalist, version. It is not appropriate solution of the problem. (Zdravko mk 07:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Indeed no: simply 3R/day on each side is no solution. See-also WP:DR William M. Connolley 08:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Left-wing politics. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CynicalMe 07:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help with translation

I'm currently working on a script intended to create short articles on political parties on a variety of wikipedias simultaneously. However, in order for the technique to work I need help with translations to various languages. If you know any of the languages listed at User:Soman/Lang-Help, then please help by filling in the blanks. For example I need help with Macedonian. Thanks, --Soman 15:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1955

I reckon that your hysterical over-reaction -- and inability to recognise loaded political language such as 'armed struggle' -- is evidence enough of your unfitness to judge whether your entry is appropriate: expertise in Cypriot history is NOT required to see that.

Perhaps you can find someone not invested in promoting a specific agenda to help you. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zdravko mk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tito Petkovski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSUCTLT

Hi. Could you have a look at Confederazione dei Sindacati Unici Classisti del Territorio libero di Trieste and see if there is any Serbo-Croat material that could be used for expansion? The article is currently at T:TDYK, but is considered too short. Thanks, --Soman (talk) 03:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out! Sorry to bother you with such obscure subjects. --Soman (talk) 13:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Juan Donoso Cortés, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caceres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Deutscher Memorial Prize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Committee of Union and Progress

Would you be interested in joining a discussion about this article? --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lists versus categories

Hi Zdravko mk -- I reverted the category add on Category:Films about the labor movement (diff); looks like it was a mistake on your part, but just in case not, I wanted to call to your attention that that category is for articles about individual films, not lists of films. Ping me back if you want to talk. --Lquilter (talk) 21:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of power stations in Albania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fierza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debar Municipality, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turks and Macedonians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A luta continua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Zdravko mk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zdravko mk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zdravko mk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi Zdravko mk,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 18:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar, Hi Czar,

Thanks for the links, I'll check them. I am contributing this period more on Kronstadt and Kropotkin since soon is 100th anniversary of the rebellion and Kropotkin's death.

By the way, not very Anarchist user name ;)

See you around.

:) Nice! I've been rewriting the Kronstadt article over the past few weeks. czar 19:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Praxis School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alienation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]