User talk:Zar1400

This is Zar1400's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosemond Group (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. The sources doesnt meet WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosemond Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zar1400! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:00, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Zar1400/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Zar1400/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 12:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I understand you have blocked my account because it seemed like it was only being used for promotion. but i want to say it was an unintentional mistake and I did not mean to violate any rules. now the Wikipedia deleted the Rosemond Group page, and I now understand the importance of keeping content non-promotional. I’ve read guidelines carefully, and I’m committed to making sure my future edits are neutral and genuinely helpful. Please unblock me. I’d really like the chance to contribute positively to the community. Thanks so much for your time and consideration." Zar1400 (talk) 09:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zar1400 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am requesting an unblock as I now understand the issues with my initial article draft. I was attempting to create a Wikipedia page for Rosemond EMI, a company with notable achievements in Iran’s engineering and energy sectors, but realize now that my approach may have been too promotional in tone and didn't fully align with Wikipedia’s guidelines. I’ve reviewed Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing and am committed to rewriting the article with a neutral, encyclopedic tone, focusing only on verifiable, third-party information. If allowed to access my sandbox, I would use it to draft a version that removes promotional language and aligns better with Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you for considering my request. Zar1400 (talk) 05:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're going to need more than your commitment; we'll need a demonstration of your understanding of these policies. Please tell what topics other than this company you might edit about. If you are associated with this company, that must be disclosed(see WP:COI and WP:PAID). It seems like you used an AI to write at least some of this request(about half of it, based on the checker I used); we want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words in the future. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zar1400 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I understand the importance of Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, reliable sourcing, and the need to avoid promotional content. I apologize if my previous request seemed impersonal; English is not my first language, so I initially used an AI tool to help with grammar and spelling, which may have impacted the tone.

I have edited other company pages, including Golrang Industrial Group, Mobile Communication Company of Iran, and Snapp, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and reliable sourcing. I fully understand the need to avoid any promotional language and to base all edits on independent, verifiable sources.

Additionally, as a PhD student specializing in AI, I am interested in contributing to Wikipedia's articles on AI in the future, helping to expand knowledge in that field. If required, I will disclose any connection with Rosemond EMI and follow Wikipedia's COI and paid editing guidelines (WP and WP ) to ensure transparency.

Thank you for considering my request, and I appreciate the opportunity to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. Zar1400 (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Removing duplicate request. asilvering (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While your unblock request is awaiting evaluation by administrators, you should take this opportunity to review the essay entitled Wikipedia:Large language models. This outlines the risk of using AI when writing content. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you are not allowed to remove declined unblock requests from this page (WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosemond Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosemond Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

Hello, I understand the importance of Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, reliable sourcing, and the need to avoid promotional content. I apologize if my previous request seemed impersonal; English is not my first language, so I initially used an AI tool to help with grammar and spelling, which may have impacted the tone. I have edited other company pages, including Golrang Industrial Group, Mobile Communication Company of Iran, and Snapp, and I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and reliable sourcing. I fully understand the need to avoid any promotional language and to base all edits on independent, verifiable sources. Additionally, as a PhD student specializing in AI, I am interested in contributing to Wikipedia's articles on AI in the future, helping to expand knowledge in that field. If required, I will disclose any connection with Rosemond EMI and follow Wikipedia's COI and paid editing guidelines (WP and WP ) to ensure transparency. Thank you for considering my request, and I appreciate the opportunity to contribute constructively to Wikipedia Zar1400 (talk) 09:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zar1400 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand you have blocked my account because it seemed like it was only being used for promotion. but i want to say it was an unintentional mistake and I did not mean to violate any rules. now the Wikipedia deleted the Rosemond Group page, and I now understand the importance of keeping content non-promotional. I’ve read guidelines carefully, and I’m committed to making sure my future edits are neutral and genuinely helpful. Please unblock me. I’d really like the chance to contribute positively to the community. Thanks so much for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

Are you planning to write a Rosemond Group article? Or are you planning to edit other subjects? If so, which topics? PhilKnight (talk) 04:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, I am not planning to write an article on the Rosemond Group. The reason I initially started working on that article was because the company is quite prominent in my country, and I had read about it in many places and heard people talk about it often. I was surprised to see it didn’t have a Wikipedia page, so I decided to start one. However, unintentionally, my tone in the article wasn’t appropriate for Wikipedia, which led to its deletion. This happened because I was new to Wikipedia, but I have now read all the guidelines thoroughly and understand my mistake. I’m now fully aware of the importance of neutrality and following Wikipedia's rules. I don’t mind working on any other topic. My only goal is to be useful and contribute positively to the community. Thank you for your time and consideration.

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zar1400 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not planning to write an article on the Rosemond Group. The reason I initially started working on that article was because the company is quite prominent in my country, and I had read about it in many places and heard people talk about it often. I was surprised to see it didn’t have a Wikipedia page, so I decided to start one. However, unintentionally, my tone in the article wasn’t appropriate for Wikipedia, which led to its deletion. This happened because I was new to Wikipedia, but I have now read all the guidelines thoroughly and understand my mistake. I’m now fully aware of the importance of neutrality and following Wikipedia's rules. I don’t mind working on any other topic. My only goal is to be useful and contribute positively to the community. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Accept reason:

Unblocking per commitment to avoid writing about Rosemond Group and to use a neutral tone. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 14:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zar1400 (talk) 08:15, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What other topics do you wish to edit? House Blaster (talk • he/they) 21:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as i am PHD student of Artificial Intelligence, i am able to edit pages like : Machine_learning, Artificial intelligence, Generative AI, other topics related to AI field.

also i can add some more references for companies which i am familiar with, like : snapp, digikala, divar, golrang, irancell.

Also I am particularly interested in areas related to technology and computer hardware. I have a strong familiarity with topics such as the history of computer hardware, including microprocessors, CPUs, GPUs, and other components, which i am able to edit. Zar1400 (talk) 04:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I would ask that you refrain from using AI to generate Wikipedia articles (asking it to rephrase something you wrote would be fine); can you commit to this? Finally, I need a commitment to write using neutral language free of puffery (stuff like "Today, Digikala offers an extensive selection of products, including but not limited to:" is unacceptable). Thanks, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can absolutely commit to not using AI for generating wikipedia article. I'll only use AI to rephrase content or assist in ensuring correct grammar and spelling.

And absolutely, I can commit to writing in a clear, neutral, and factual tone without any puffery or marketing language. I’ll keep responses straightforward, concise, and free from promotional or exaggerated language.

I want to assure you that I will remain committed to these obligations.

Thanks Zar1400 (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. @Jimfbleak: Do you object to unblocking? I think we can extend some WP:ROPE. Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 17:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseBlaster:, thanks. Fine with me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:32, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Thank you. I just wanted to check if you would be able to unblock me. I am fully committed to the guidelines discussed with @HouseBlaster and look forward to contributing positively. Please let me know if there are any other requirements I need to fulfill.Thanks! Zar1400 (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]