Zangouang

I am Zangouang (talk) 15:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zangouang, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zangouang! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Arabic vs Tunisian

Hi did really you read Huon statement ? « Given that we have reliable secondary sources such as that Libération article unequivocally stating that literary Arabic, not Tunisian Arabic, is the official language, we should use literary Arabic in official contexts, for example for the state motto. The use of Tunisian Arabic is obviously on the rise, but I don't think it's sufficiently common yet to be widely used for historical contexts such as, say, the spelling of Bourguiba's name - I have not seen a reliable published source that uses the Tunisian Arabic spelling for him. For biographies of living individuals matters are somewhat more complicated and may need to be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on how reliable published sources most commonly refer to that person. Given the discussion above I see no reason at all to provide Tunisian Arabic transliterations without published sources backing them up. That's original research. Huon (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2015 (UTC) » in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Tunisia/Archive_2015 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Exacrion. --Helmoony (talk) 17:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What i have certainly seen, is that the matter was resolved since then and you suddenly started actions after 3 months for no reason. Also, from what I have seen, the official names remained untouched as with the official name of the tunisian republic, but common names were relinked toward tunisian. Sorry but i do not approve those changes you are makingZangouang (talk) 22:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Zangouang. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
Message added 17:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stifle (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Follow Stifle's advice. ☑ SamuelWantman 20:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016 Blocked for Sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet of Exacrion.

Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended.

Account information: block log · edits · logs
Sockpuppetry information:

suspected sockpuppets · confirmed socks

If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NJA (t/c) 07:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I've put rationale here. NJA (t/c) 07:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]