User talk:Zaha11

June 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bernd Leno— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thomas Walsh (skier). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:11, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Toruń gingerbread, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bearsden. Quanstizium (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaha11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I meant no harm, was only having a little fun, I do sincerely apologise for any inconveniences Zaha11 (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Decline as unresponsive. You may make a new request when you are able to engage with us. 331dot (talk) 11:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If we unblocked you so you could edit seriously, what sort of articles would you edit? Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]