User talk:Zad68/Archive 2010

Judaism's view of Jesus

I just saw your post @ talk there explaining how the view of Jesus is peripheral. I have to say, I thought what you wrote was clear, concise, and accurate. Well done! Kaisershatner (talk) 01:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

a barnstar from Avi dated 08:57, 26 October 2010 (UTC) that was here has been moved to my barnstars list

And again…

Well done! I respect and appreciate when the logical fallacy in an argument can be clearly enunciated. Not only does it repudiate the previous statement, it also goes a long way in preventing ill-will, as the proposer of the flawed argument is not attacked; merely the logic (or lack thereof). However, to be persnickety, I think the fallacy involved is denying the antecedent and not the fallacy of the undistributed middle. Let statement A be "If MJ is Christianity (P), then it is not Judaism (~Q)". Statement B, at least according to DeknMike, is "MJ is not Christianity (~P)". From this, he wanted to state MJ is Judaism, but that is the fallacy of denying the antecedent, as ((P --> ~Q) ^ ~P) does not imply Q. -- Avi (talk) 23:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

ALL CAPS is inappropriate

In internet speech, using ALL CAPS [1]is considered shouting. In all my editing, I refrained from namecalling and personal attacks, even though I have been the object of many. I laid out a case proving the term 'Messianic Judaism' existed since the 1800, but you and other editors continue to hang onto one source that has one line that might be interpreted to say it was created in the 1960. All my edit said was that after half a century of slow growth, the term came into prominence during the 1960s. I was deeply offended by your inappropriate behavior when 'piling on' to someone else's point of view. --DeknMike (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)