User talk:ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th

April 2022

Hello, I'm PureRED. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to May 17 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. PureRED | talk to me | 18:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zachary Shrank

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Zachary Shrank, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zshrank (November 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why was it declined? ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zshrank

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Zshrank, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to say sorry for my actions. I was getting paid money to make that wiki, and I just put the information they told me. I need WIKI to feed my family every night, and I hope you will find it in your heart to let me appeal this. I swear I will do background checks next time, and ensure not to do anything else bad.

Decline reason:

No. Wikipedia isn't the place for you to do this. Wow. Yamla (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) You know the one thing you should not do, when in a hole? Dig more. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock.2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for many reasons, and failed my first attempt. However, I'd like for you to hear me out for this one. I am a writer, my job depends on this. I got a little freaked out as if I was to get "blocked" again, I could face being fired from my job. I have a meeting with my boss in 30 mins. I swear this will not happen again. I just want to help wiki, and my clients. Thank you for taking your time to read this.

Decline reason:

Quite simply, we are not going to unblock you. You are being paid to edit, and bluntly since you're doing it for promotion, that's not going to happen. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please see WP:BOSS. It is deeply unethical of your boss to ask you to violate Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Yamla (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I get paid to make them on Wiki/ NYT.

He doesn't know what I write. I handle commissions on Wiki, as we get extra funds. ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (talk). 17:38, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what I write to be fir. ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (talk). 17:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will not be unblocked to promote your clients. This is the end of the line for that approach. It will not happen, we are fundamentally not interested in you promoting your clients and you should not be using Wikipedia for that. --Yamla (talk) 17:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not to promote my clients. Some articles are real, I'm being tasked to edit/write an article about a future president of the United State's, this one was a hoax done by them, and I won't let it happen again.

I use it to spread information, via Wiki & the New York Times.

Please ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (talk). 17:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. And what article was the hoax? --Yamla (talk) 17:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZachMedalOfHonorMay17th (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not use this to promote myself or others. I have a job, and we got commissioned to write an article on Wiki.

It was a hoax, we got paid by someone who used a fake credit-card that bypassed our systems and security stuff. The Local Police have been notified about this, and due to the amount of $$$, my boss Diane Brayton (Executive Vice President & General Counsel) ordered me to create the post as a normal person ain't have that much money.

I'd like to apologize on behalf of the entire team at the New York Times. I hope that you will be able to forgive me as I would lose around 50% in commissions, and I cannot be promoted to Chief Growth and Customer Officer without it.

Decline reason:

Really, that's just too bad. If any of this is real, we don't care. But it's not, so we don't care even harder. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm pulling talk page access. We're being trolled. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]