Jump to content

User talk:Zaalim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 04:03, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerillero: Hi, blocking me won't solve any problem. As most new page patrollers don't have the courage to nominate page for deletion. I have experience to deal with these guys. Action Hero, NewMutants, The Amazing Spiderman everybody helped to protect this project. 80% of spam articles and auto biographies are created by Indians. You people don't have the knowledge to deal with them. Some are faking references to fool the administrators. Either you ask New Page patrollers to be more vigilant about pages related to India, Pakistan, Indonesia or allow me to edit. Check this article and it's talk page Chandrakant Solanki Lyricist, how the user faked refences and people acted in good faith to allow the article to remain. You people are good faith editors, you don't recognize trolls, vandals, spammers easily, Lol.

Check this page also, Another example of gaming the system

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:JohnCD#Nishit_Ashokkumar_Mehta

Everybody trusted the references; i didn't as i checked the references and found them as fake.

There are plenty other Examples, The latest being the talk page of Administrator SpacemanSpiff.

I am sure you will ignore me message, without even reading it and revoke my talk page access.

If someone did something wrong, then you guys will tag him as bad forever till death.Zaalim (talk) 06:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaalim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Looking at the current state of new page patrol, most new page patrollers are not working properly. I may have done something bad, but New page patrol can't function wthout me, think again. Right now i can only access this account and The Amazing Spiderman. There are lots useless pages which are kept as the title is good which makes the patrollers not verify the contents.--Zaalim (talk) 09:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia will continue to function prefectly well without you. The argument that we should unblock you because the project can't manage without your "services" is, frankly, laughable. Yunshui 雲水 10:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui: I am not talking about the full project. I am only talking about new page patrol where the auto-biographers create fake references and hoax which are ignored by these people. The good faith editors have too much good faith and some people are taking advantage of that. I don't have to assume WP:AGF (with spammers, hoax creators, auto-biographers, users who come to promote their newly opened website and company all the time) as you remember that my first interactions in Wikipedia was with LanguageXpert socks, Desysopped administrator Dangerouspanda, sockpuppet Darkness Shines. Zaalim (talk) 10:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The smooth functioning or otherwise of NPP is not in any way relevant to your block. You do not seem to realise that you are now part of the problem, not part of the solution. Every time you evade your block, you are further cementing this fact. Yunshui 雲水 10:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru asked me to take standard offer in 2014. Six months was too much. I have created too much useless accounts in past few months. He wants me to make unblock request from my original account which i can't access. I sometimes used VPN proxy to avoid Check User. Instead of being any help VPN IPs created more problems for me. All vandals who used those VPN IPs were blocked as my socks. There is a provision in VPN proxies like cyberghost that 30 to 40 users can choose a particular IP. If my talk page access is not revoked i will make unblock request here after 8 months. I hope the new page patrollers are able to deal with Indian autobiographers and those who use Wikipedia for promotion till that time.Zaalim (talk) 10:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very well; we will see you in eight months. Note that the time constraints of the standard offer are generally assumed to begin from your last edit to Wikipedia, including edits made by sockpuppets. Yunshui 雲水 10:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yunshui my Vodafone IPs used to start with 112.79..and geolocated to Kolkata. But three days ago they were changed to 1.36... by my ISP provider. I didn't change my ISP provider or location, Vodafone servers are the ones who are doing this. Even right now they are not showing my exact location. My current Ip 1.39.38.76 is showing my location as Mumbai, though I am sitting far away from Mumbai. And I was the anonymous IP who commented on SpacemanSpiff's talk page about KingMandhata socks. Zaalim (talk) 11:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New members of the group

[edit]

@SpacemanSpiff: Malhar Kolis is probably another article created by KingMandhaata. This is also single user account created for every single article.

As i promised Yunshui not to edit for 8 months I can't do anything other than keeping these pages under my watchlist. I am the Ip who commented on your talk page yesterday. There are so many articles which needs to be deleted. --Zaalim (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are under an agreement with Yunshui to not edit for eight months then don't do so. These articles will be found sooner or later and there's no reason for you to violate a ban, especially in light of the above posts from Yunshui etc. —SpacemanSpiff 15:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SpacemanSpiff: Kis Kis Se Pyaar Karun is a hoax/wrong version of Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon. Zaalim (talk) 17:22, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zaalim&oldid=1139954210"