User talk:Yuvaraj Boobalan

This is Yuvaraj Boobalan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sri Manonmani Textiles/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sri Manonmani Textiles! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yuvaraj Boobalan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Yuvaraj Boobalan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand the reason for the block due to my previous username being associated with a business. I will no longer engage in promotional activities and intend to contribute valuable edits to Wikipedia. I will focus on improving articles related to textiles, business practices, and other areas within my expertise.

Accept reason:

Accepted per below discussion. Please make your COI disclosure promptly, and comply with the guidance set out at WP:COI. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those topic areas will be difficult for you to edit in, given your conflict of interest; please review that policy and tell us how you will make such contributions, and/or if there are topics for which you have no conflict of interest that you might edit about. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot, DoubleGrazing: User renamed. Unblock not performed pending answer to the above. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the opportunity to address these concerns. I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's neutrality and assure you that I will not engage in any promotional activities. I have carefully reviewed the conflict of interest (COI) policy and will strictly follow it.

I plan to contribute to Wikipedia in areas unrelated to my business or personal interests, such as general history, science, and cultural topics. If I ever need to edit articles related to textiles or business, I will fully disclose my COI and limit my involvement to suggesting changes on talk pages for review by neutral editors.

I value Wikipedia's mission and look forward to making constructive contributions. 117.97.140.189 (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please log in when you're posting, and please don't use an AI as you did here(76% certain according to gptzero) 331dot (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, please log into your account whenever editing, so that we know who we're talking to.

Secondly, please do not use LLM tools to generate your messages; we want to hear from you, not from some algorithm. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the concern and apologize for any confusion caused earlier this reply is written by me without any assistance from external tools.

I have reviewer Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy and will fully comply with it ,moving forward. I will focus on editing topic where i have no conflict of interest and will make any suggestions in area related to my expertise transparently on the talk pages for review by neutral editors

Thank you for considering my request Yuvaraj Boobalan (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing I think this is worth a shot, what do you think? 331dot (talk) 09:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, @331dot; go for it. (And thanks for checking with me, but don't feel that you have to.)

It seems we posted essentially the same message earlier, with the same timestamp even. Snap! :) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:04, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps you were telling me to unblock this myself... I'll do that now. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Had to step away.....but thanks. 331dot (talk) 10:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]