User talk:Yuoiuysdh

Image tagging for Image:Jay americangangster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jay americangangster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Yuoiuysdh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Spellcast 01:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Her Name Is Nicole. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Spellcast 01:18, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Seka 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seka 2007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jelena Karleusa.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jelena Karleusa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damaged (Danity Kane song)

Welcome, and thank you for editing the page Damaged (Danity Kane song) on Wikipedia. Please be careful not to remove maintenance templates from articles without addressing the issue listed. If you believe the tag is placed in error use the article's associated talk page to explain your changes. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lenny Kravitz

Greetings. Please see the Wikipedia style guideline WP:REDLINK before continuing to remove red links from articles. Regards. dissolve ^talk 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heaven Sent (song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Heaven Sent (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Heaven Sent (song). Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Acquitted (album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lindsay Lohan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 20:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Keri rtf.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keri rtf.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United World Chart

Hi there, please do not add UWC to music or song articles. This has been determined to be non-legit/non-notable per consensus at AfD. You can see more at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. Thanks. - eo (talk) 12:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Whatcha Think About That

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Whatcha Think About That, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. raven1977 (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Whatcha Think About That

An article that you have been involved in editing, Whatcha Think About That, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whatcha Think About That. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? raven1977 (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's Not Me, It's You

Per WP:ALBUM#LEAK, leak information and dates are generally non-notable. --Madchester (talk) 04:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eh Eh

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Eh, Eh (Nothing Else I Can Say), you will be blocked from editing. "Legolas" (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GaGa

Please provide an edit sum. when rv articles. Thanks!Dance-pop (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of citation tags

Do not remove citation tags from articles unless you are adding a reliable source.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Right Round, you will be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Circus (Britney Spears album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — R ² 01:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lady Gaga discography. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, wait a second, why does this person get in trouble for that? People do that all the time, and it's terrible to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blocking this person because of a few unsourced edits is an impulsive move. If Wikipedia wants to have a reputation for impulsiveness and guidelines and policies that are unfair to people, well, then it's not my problem. I just don't like the threats that this person is receiving. --Zzguitar14 (talk) 10:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where you get your information?

How do you know what the Billboard chart is before it is updated on Thursdays? I've been wondering who's been correctly updating the charts and I discover that it's you....so how do you know a day before the Billboard Hot 100 is updated? --Zzguitar14 (talk) 00:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wondering the same thing. Yvesnimmo (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Yves (talk) 14:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Nicki Minaj discography. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yves (talk) 14:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to If I Had You (Adam Lambert song), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Aspects (talk) 14:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from If I Had You (Adam Lambert song). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 14:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Time (Dirty Bit). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Yves (talk) 00:06, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]