User talk:Yunshui/Archive 67
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yunshui. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 |
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| You have contributed so much on wikipedia and answered so many questions in the Teahouse, so I award you this barnstar! Cupcake547 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC) |
Hi
I am a Korean Wikipedia user. nice to meet you! ㅡDts duck(토론)10:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Eight years! |
|---|
we miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Peer review
Hi there, hope you are doing fine. Expecting your valuable comments here. Thank you.--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 05:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
A cheeseburger for you!
|
Stay well mate. All the best. EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 17:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Purvanchal Expressway
Hi! Hope you are doing well. Just would like to bring to your kind notice of an incidence regarding the article Purvanchal Expressway. A user namely Akash Singh India has been continuously and constantly removing sourced data from the page. In the past, he has several times, inspite of being notified thoroughly of the edit war rulings of Wikipedia on his talk page, constantly broken 3 revert rule and engaged in edit war, while reverting and editing referenced info, making it one sided and biased, apparently inviting sockpuppetry allegations which now I believe is inevitable. Recently, he deleted the entire controversy section of the article “Purvanchal Expressway” which was sourced and put in by an unknown editor, I just restored the data citing unexplained sourced info removal, he has yet again responded with reverting, and mentioned this in my talk page, ”Good to see u back here. Tomorrow I will create criticism section in Agra-Lucknow Expressway with sources. This is just for your information.” I totally welcome if any editor edits or contributes to Wiki but am offended with the way he has responded, as if anyhow I was related to Agra Lucknow Expressway and by doing this he will probably take revenge, totally indicates that he is engaged in edit war. Also, there is already a section of controversy on article “Agra Lucknow Expressway”, I don’t understand what he meant to express by saying that he will create criticism page with sources, and at the same time removing criticism page of another expressway article. What I supposedly assume is that both expressways are built by different Chief Ministers of different political parties, and somehow or the other he has been violating Wiki neutrality guidelines. Need your help, as this has been far more number of times, and any user would be far disappointed with such behaviour from fellow editors. Kindly look into this. Thank you! Shresthsingh71 (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Deletion review for IZArc
An editor has asked for a deletion review of IZArc. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RekishiEJ (talk) 18:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hope all is well
Hello Yunshui! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to let you know that I added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. If you ever come back, or choose not to have your name on this list, just let me know. Hope you come back, even just to check in, Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 17:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblock request from BashurMan --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Miss you
|
Rose in memoriam |
| I remember you; I mourn your departure. I wish you all the best, wherever you are now. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 21:42, 1 October 2021 (UTC) |
review my draft please
Dear Yunshui. I've made drfat of the new article Dr Haris Parengal. Please do a review. I am new to wikepedia.--Ctbcmpm (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Hi Ctbcmpm. Yunshui has not edited Wikipedia in almost two years so it's unlikely he will respond to your request. Draft:Haris Parengal has already been submitted for a WP:AFC review; so, the best thing to do is just be patient and wait until a AFC reviewer gets to it. I'm not sure when that will be, but the template at the top of the draft's page says
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,982 pending submissions waiting for review
. You can, however, continue to work on improving the draft while you're waiting for it to be reviewed. One general suggestion I can make would be for you to add more inline citations to the body of the draft; so far, you have only one inline citation in the draft. There are a number of sources listed in the "References" section, but there's no way for anyone to really know which source supports what content. Adding inline citations will make it much easier for the reviewer to assess the notability of the subject and verify the draft's content. If you're not sure how to do this, please take a look at WP:REFB. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)