User talk:Yukirat

The Original Barnstar

Thanks for your efforts to maintain neutrality in articles pertaining to race and racialism. Ryodox 20:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White (people)

Hi. I'm guessing you haven't seen my comments yet, but just as a reminder. Could you comment on my response and proposals at Talk:White (people)? Thanks. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk 21:01, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago Hot Dog

Can you please provide a citation for the notion that Chicago hot dogs are only steamed, rather than steamed or boiled? I've certainly eaten Chicago dogs which were boiled & a web search shows hits for both steamed and boiled chicago-style dogs. The article does mention grilled char dogs, but I'm unaware of any slang for a steamed vs. a boiled dog. --Karnesky 12:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you visit Chicago, one will see that the dogs sit in below-boiling water when pulled out. The dogs are pre-cooked so heating to boiling point is totally unnecessary.Yukirat 00:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was read what you said on the history page some Hispanics are also white so I do not get where you come from althought i agree non-Hispanic whites aren't marring white any faster. Thanks (FR-Altas 16:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

hi

hi i am just keeping an eye out for this page to and reverting AL. So i am sorry if I mess up. But I would like you help also. (24.60.172.138 05:15, 7 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I am just removing some things Al-Andalus that he did use the talk page for this is how they were before he edit them. (71.232.231.151 17:23, 7 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[1] made on July 9 2006 (UTC) to White (people)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 10:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you've violated 3RR again. If you'd like to revert yourself then you can avoid being blocked. -Will Beback 23:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that I have, can you show me specifically? Thanks. How can you say that?Yukirat 23:45, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White people

What type of source do you need? ~~Both of the sources~~ The source (edited - I had thought I used 2 sources) I used in that paragraph contains the relevant information. Perhaps I should instead say "as high as" and note the highest percentage (e.g. Semino et al shows 27.3% prevalence for Sicily, 25% for Albania, and 23.8% for non-Macedonian Greece. I'll implement this now. Reply at my talk page if you have any questions or concerns, please. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 02:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Western civilization"

Yukirat, you have missed the point altogether. The "western civilization" comment cannot go in, not because it may or may not be associated with "Whites" (assuming that the definition of "White" which is used is the one which implies ONLY caucasoid European Christians are white), but because it is not a common requirement to be "White" according to most definitions. It is only among White nationalist circles where it is a requirement for classification as white, and to suggest otherwise is a massive misrepresentation.

You must realise, that if you suggest "western civilization" is a common feature, then that excludes many Europeans based solely on religion, among them Bosnians, Albanians, and many others. Most definitions of white include those people, even among most White nationlists it would be only those who held the strictest of minority views which would exclude them. Western civilization is not a common feature. If you insit with that POV that western civilization is a common feature, then you have unwillingly admitted that "whites" and "whiteness" is indeed a purely social construct (something which i have been saying all along) and has absolutely no basis on anthropology (caucasoid), Europeanness, or genetics (since a Bosnian Muslim is non-White because Muslims are not a part of "western civilization", but a Catholic Croat is white, despite both being genetically identical).

You have actually proven my point. Whiteness in all its forms is a social construct. The page should reflect that. Al-Andalus 08:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong. Totally wrong. Be honest then and remove it from Arab diaspora if the Western world doesn't exist in your brain. The current definition is: "Originally defined as Western Europe, most modern uses of the term refer to the societies of Europe and their close genealogical, linguistic, and philosophical colonial descendants, typically included are those countries whose dominant culture is derived from European culture, such as North and South America, Australia and New Zealand." Stop being ridiculous. Yukirat 08:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's Policy on Etiquette

Wikipedia:Etiquette recommends not calling other users racists which is what you did to User:Ismael76 on this edit. The policy requests users avoid calling other users racists.--Dark Tichondrias 23:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting Anti-White racism

Could you re-add the racism category to the Mexica Movement article? It seems you are interested in counteracting anti-White bias on Wikipedia. Some people believe the Mexica Movement's views are not racist, so have objected to my categorization of the article under racism. The organization is clearly racist video link because they want European Americans to go back to Europe, play the race card by calling everyone against illegal immigration "White racists" and consider European ancestry among mestizos as a scar. I do not want it to look like I am the only one who considers them to be racists. I would like another editor other than me to categorize their organization under the racism category, so it can be shown that it is the consenses on the issue.--Dark Tichondrias 10:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Fostering Anti-semitism

I'm sorry but I do not think that anyone will automatically associate the title with "Nazis". I suppose I could comprehend your misunderstanding if English is a second language for you, but other than that your comment really confounds me.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 09:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the new heading, I think it's more appropriate.Yukirat 09:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although the actual word "anti-semitism" didn't really come to exist until the 19th century, there is nothing that suggests that the idea did not exist prior to that. In fact it is a historical fact that different forms of anti-semitism have existed since prior to the birth of Christ.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 09:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This might help you understand wikipedia a bit.Mooncrest 12:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Yukirat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mooncrest 12:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]