User talk:Ytrewqt

Welcome!

Hello Ytrewqt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

AfD tags

Please do not remove AfD tags. Even if you feel the nom was bad faith, you are not allowed to remove the tags. Guettarda 15:40, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't get smarky with me--Ytrewqt 15:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From the biolerplate itself: "You are welcome to edit this article, but please do not blank this article or remove this notice while the discussion is in progress." Many poeple consider removing AfD tags as vandalism

And "smarky" would be...? Guettarda 15:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help on the Condoms article too bad it's been reverted. Chooserr 04:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Some editors, probably most, consider removing sourced material without good reason to be vandalism. It certainly makes the antennae twitch. So please don't do it. Give clear reasons on talk for your edits or expect to be reverted. Cheers now. James James 05:33, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chipsmarck

Thanks for the picture. It's always nice to see what other contributors look like. Happy holidays to you. James James 07:24, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

hey

I didn't do that, Nunh-huh (talk · contribs) was playing with my chipmunk--Ytrewqt 07:28, 26 December 2005 (UTC) {{unblock}}--Ytrewqt 07:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your removals were correctly reverted

At Martin Luther and the Jews. FYI, several people worked to get consensus for months, see the talk. ←Humus sapiens ←ну? 08:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You fuckin faggot why did you block me from editing pages?

In response to your e-mail, consisting solely of your e-mail address and "You fuckin faggot why did you block me from editing pages?", I would make the following response: Because you were repeatedly attempting to insert erroneous information into Wikipedia, insistently trying to persuade the gullible that it was authentic, and were repeatedly uncivil in doing so. - Nunh-huh 07:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A warning would probably have been sufficient. Please don't post people's emails. That's rude. James James 07:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? That's what strikes you as rude? I'm amused. - Nunh-huh 07:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I find you both rude, if that makes you happy. I'm not excusing him. I'm appealing to you because I have a higher opinion of you. James James 08:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm even more amused since I didn't send you any emails--Ytrewqt 04:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that is rather amusing. - Nunh-huh 06:08, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Smarckin'

The message you left on James James' talk page, was accompanied by an awesome picture which was removed (?scratches head?) if it was an accident or something I urge you to re-upload it. Chooserr 00:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

greetings

I'm new here so I thought I'd introduce myself to some of the people here--Chapline R Vine^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 02:46, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board

Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]