User talk:Yrdsb

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yrdsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not abuse accounts and will help edit wikipedia and also use sources to edit wikipedia and help do anti vandalism using all my accounts and wont abuse any of my accounts and i will improve by only using this account and nothing else also please do a conditional unblock where if i vandlize or use more then one account again then i will get blocked again Yrdsb (talk) 21:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appeal leads me to believe that you don't understand why you were blocked. You're specifically noting that you intend to continue using multiple accounts if you were to be unblocked ("help do anti vandalism using all my accounts and wont abuse any of my accounts"). You then go on to state that you could be blocked if you were to "use more then [sic] one account again". You may want to consider the standard offer. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal The third time

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yrdsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will stick with 1 account and I will also follow wikipedia policy and not vandalize wikipedia and will do research on reliable sources and help do some anti vandalism on wikipedia. Yrdsb (talk

Decline reason:

You might want to consider the Standard Offer.

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edit, using any account or anonymously, on English Wikipedia.
Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
Don't give people reasons to object to your return.

After you have waited six months, contact a willing administrator or experienced editor (via your user talk page, email, #wikipedia-en-unblock ^connect or WP:UTRS) (list of administrators).
If they agree a review is appropriate, they'll open a thread at an administrative noticeboard (ideally Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard).
Discussion usually takes a few days. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yrdsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will try to stick to this account and not try to do sockpuppetry by using many other account also I will try to do helpful edits and not abuse 1 account to vandelize then send me to admin conversion also I will try to follow the rules and try to do research and reference after I edit the Wikipedia. thank you Yrdsb (talk) 1:12 am, Today (UTC−4).

Decline reason:

Try? It's simple. Stop creating new accounts. Every time we catch you evading your block and crating new accounts or editing not logged in, it increases the time before we would even think about unblocking you. You are now ineligible to consideration of an unblock until February 5, 2023. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion. This user is not eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO at that time and would need to deal with their block evasion during their block. --Yamla (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yrdsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not vandelized wikipedia using any account also I will try to be a good member in the wikipedia community by doing many good things and using many refrences to makes wikipedia pages for many places and try to be a good member to the community for example if i see someone vandelize a page i can give them a warning and if they continue I will report them to the admin boardYrdsb (talk) 18:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to Cdgcentreaccount. Try again no sooner than 2023-09-04, and only if you avoid any editing between now and then. Yamla (talk) 18:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.