User talk:You've gone incognito/Archive 4

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For taking the time to review The Shawshank Redemption, raising its status for the first time in 16 years! Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 15:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

It was my pleasure, Darkwarriorblake. And I thank you for awarding my first barnstar ever, couldn't be more happier! Slightlymad 15:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Isabel Granada

I missed your addition of the source. I'm waiting on the ABS-CBN story to load. The Inquirer is reporting it also,[1] so there's probably enough to go on now. —C.Fred (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 13:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Slightlymad. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Alex Shih (talk) 05:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Periods in captions

Great work on Homecoming! I have a question. When you state "Adding period in caption as it's followed by a complete sentence" (Spider-Man: Homecoming), what do you mean? Do you mean that the period follows the complete sentence? Because there is no sentence after the period. SassyCollins (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

SassyCollins It was a typo. In any case, see WP:CAPFRAG. Slightlymad 10:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! SassyCollins (talk) 10:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Final Destination 3

Hello Slightlymad. Hope you are doing well. Since your oppose on Final Destination 3 I have further improved the "Reception" section. I was wondering if you could look through it to see if there's anything you'd want me to improve or not. PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Alma mater vs. alma maters (or almae matres)

Hi. Regarding, the grammar edits on Dan Gilroy, I refer you to the Wiktionary entry for alma mater. In English (alma maters) and Latin (almae matres) an "s" is added to create the plural form. In Portuguese and Spanish, an "s" is not added. Regards, --Jeremy Butler 13:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dan Gilroy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dan Gilroy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Vera Farmiga

Hi, thanks for the message. I replied on my talk page but maybe you didn't see it there. I've reverted this in the lead and the infobox, but I've left it in the later section obviously. The Guardian source is good, but Ukrainian-American is not a nationality, and the source doesn't say it is her nationality, even if she identifies herself this way. MOSBIO prefers nationality in the lead, not ethnicity. If she holds Ukrainian citizenship, which she may well do, we would need a source for that. --hippo43 (talk) 12:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slightlymad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Slightlymad|<font color="black">''Slightly''</font>]][[User talk:Slightlymad|<font color="black">'''''mad'''''</font>]] : Slightlymad

to

[[User:Slightlymad|<i style="color: black;">Slightly</i>]][[User talk:Slightlymad|<i style="color: black;">'''mad'''</i>]] : Slightlymad

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:36, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

 Done Slightlymad 03:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dan Gilroy

The article Dan Gilroy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dan Gilroy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Resident Evil: Apocalypse

Hey mate, thanks for your interest in Resident Evil: Apocalypse. Regarding your removal of the awards table, MOS:FILM#Accolades doesn't seem to say you expressly can't have a table unless there are 'many' awards, I think it's just saying it's a better idea to present them in this way if there are many. Do you think removing the table improves the article? I'm not up in arms about this, but I did think it was better with it, though my opinion is of course a bit biased since I'm heavily invested in the article. It's nice to have some fresh perspective, so mainly I'm just wondering if you think this makes the article better or if you're just making sure the article adheres strictly to MOS:FILM regardless of whether it's an improvement or not. Also I've passed two film article through FAC that only had half a dozen awards; they both had awards tables and nobody challenged them.

In any case, the article is currently listed for peer review (see here) in preparation for nominating it for FAC. I'd be very grateful if you would comment on it, and I'd be happy to review something in return for you, but no pressure. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 08:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Policy aside, the table is just too skimpy to warrant its own table. I would probably leave it alone if it were more than five awards. Besides, all of them have been adequately covered in the prose, whose length just further proves my point. Slightlymad 09:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

McQueen filmography

I couldn't find much sources that cover his TV roles. How about if I use TV Guide and The Classic TV archives? Is that good?  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:37, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Ssven2, I believe TV Guide is a vetted reference, although I'm on the fence on the latter source. Slightlymad 11:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean by "on the fence"?  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

It means I'm undecided on whether to call that source reliable or not as I have not seen it used in articles before. Slightlymad 11:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

It does present many TV shows that cannot be found most of the time. I have managed to get sources for all TV shows here and there except for "West Point Story", for which I'm not able to get any reliable source. I have removed it now.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Lapsed Catholics has been nominated for discussion

Category:Lapsed Catholics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 17:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Shoot 'Em Up (film) copyedit

Miniapolis, I saw your assessment of the article against the B-class quality and was wondering if that infobox listing the actors prevents it from meeting the "Structure" criterion. I restored the Cast section just in case; I just didn't want the section bare-boned as it is. Slightlymad 04:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

FWIW, I looked at WP:CASTLIST and think it was okay (although I prefer a simple bullet list); there seems to be a fair amount of latitude, as long as it's not too long :-). All the best, Miniapolis 14:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

	We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
	Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Ronin

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ronin (film) has been completed.

I had a look at the clip and improved the wording (I think) describing what happens.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Twofingered Typist, two queries:

• Production: Is there really a need for 'and' in Tony Gibbs, his film editor, on George Wallace (1997), and Michael Z. Hanan,?
• Reception: Shouldn't it be a period and not a semicolon in Despite the praise these scenes drew occasional criticism from The Washington Post for being lengthy, and Variety for the excessive use of jump cuts; since it's followed by a new sentence?

Think that's all. Slightlymad 16:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

I tried to rearrange the production section—then didn't—but missed removing the now unnecessary "and".

Fixed period.

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anbe Sivam/archive1

Hello, Slightlymad. I have nominated my first solo FAC. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

The article has been promoted to FA! My first solo FA!  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 14:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Ronin and Shoot 'Em Up GAR

If you don't mind, can I take up both the GARs? I've joined the WikiCup 2018 contest BTW.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do, Ssven2! It's very kind of you to have asked even though I find it unnecessary. Slightlymad 08:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Commented on Shoot 'Em Up's GAR in case you did not receive my ping.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Commented on Ronin's GAR in case you did not receive my ping.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

BTW, no pressure but do finish it today as I'll be out of station for 2-3 days.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Found anything for Shoot 'Em Up yet. You can achieve the distinction of attaining two consecutive GAs in 24 hours.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I'll pass reference number 20 (Bullet Proof Baby.net) as I just now saw it being quoted by the director himself giving thanks to the website that sponsors the video and merchandise. Reference number 23 too, after reading it, looks alright for GA criteria even though I might suggest a better alternative. I won't push it though.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ssven2. I was actually rewriting the reception as I found a better alternative prose for it, but then I was notified that the article has been promoted. While I appreciate your lenience toward the concerns regarding the two sources, you didn't have to promote it right away if you really believe that they don't meet the GA criteria. In any case, two of my nominations have been promoted to GA and I couldn't be happier. Slightlymad 12:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Oops. I totally forgot about it. My bad. Do rewrite it now and inform me about it.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:44, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ronin (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ronin (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shoot 'Em Up (film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shoot 'Em Up (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ronin (film)

The article Ronin (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ronin (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 11:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations on the GA promotion! You did a great job on it. Betty Logan (talk) 16:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks, Betty Logan! Just to make sure its GA quality is maintained, could you put the article to your watchlist? Slightlymad 03:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

It was already on it :) Betty Logan (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shoot 'Em Up (film)

The article Shoot 'Em Up (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shoot 'Em Up (film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 12:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I noticed you still haven't expanded the critical reception section for Shoot 'Em Up.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

I no longer intend to; the current version has an adequate paragraph structure as well as length in retrospect. Besides, I didn't want section's like this overwhelmingly long just for the sake of providing enough "meat" on it. In any case, you were right about passing the article for GA; it turns out that minimal issues can be ignored if they prevent you from improving an article. Slightlymad 07:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Filemover granted

Hello Slightlymad. Your account has been granted the "filemover" user right, either following a request for it or due to a clear need for the ability to move files. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:File mover for more information on this user right and under what circumstances it is okay to move files. When you move a file please remember to update any links to the new name as well! If you do not want the file mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Alex Shih (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:16, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Krzysztof Charamsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Ronin (film)

On 7 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ronin (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite director John Frankenheimer's preference for the first ending he had shot for Ronin, the test audience "hated it"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ronin (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ronin (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Shoot the Moon

Frank has made some changes to the critical reception section. Do see if he has resolved it (looks better now IMO).  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:35, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Ssven2, I already saw the changes made even before you got me posted about it. While I am still a little bit unsatisfied with the changes to the Reception, they're not overly important in the grand scheme of things. You carry on and pass the article. Slightlymad 09:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Event Horizon (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawrence Gordon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mission- Impossible – Ghost Protocol OST.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mission- Impossible – Ghost Protocol OST.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Two years of editing, today.

Hey, Slightlymad. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Neomanila

Hi, your ALT1 hook was promoted to Prep 5. However, as it names someone who is non-notable by the fact that he doesn't have a Wikipedia page, I edited the hook. Personally, I think it's quite hooky this way. Hope you agree. Yoninah (talk) 19:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Copy edit of John Wick

I finished my copy edit of John Wick, taking care of the overquoting. There were a few other quotes I marked for possible deletion and I kept the second-party quotes in Reception. I concentrated mainly on the top-six Earwig violations, which have been improved as follows:

• lionsgatepublicity.com 94.6 → 55.9%
• cinemareview.com 67.1 → 49.2%
• hollywoodreporter 60.7 → 11.5%
• emanuellevy.com 56.1 → 10.7%
• craveonline.co.uk 42.9 → 0.0%
• uk.complex.com 41.9 → 3.8%

The top two are both due to the same long quote that I felt should be deleted (I wasn't going to paraphrase it). Aside from all the quotes, just a couple notes:

• In Cast/Alfie Allen, it mentions both a New York accent and a Russian accent which I found confusing. If there's a source that says he developed a unique accent for the role, that would be good to include.
• There was a little bit of MOS:SURNAME where you use the last name of a person after giving their full name on first occurrence (lede and body). For the fictional characters, we go with how they're most-often referred, and from the plot section it looks like John Wick is more often referred to as John.

I hope this helps, and that I was thorough enough. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Neomanila

On 23 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Neomanila, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the inspiration for the Philippine thriller Neomanila came from a BBC interview with a married couple who worked as hitmen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Neomanila. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Neomanila), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2018 (UTC)