Jump to content

User talk:Yoshuan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Genetron health

[edit]

Hello Yoshuan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Genetron health for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

to Govvy

[edit]

Okay, I understand, I need more time to edit this encyclopedia. I want to describe this company from an objective and fair perspective, like Apple Inc. yoshuan (talk) 12:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC+8)

Deb (talk) 19:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Yoshuan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Yoshuan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Yoshuan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 06:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Genetron Health (May 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   20:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yoshuan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  Velella  Velella Talk   20:54, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]