User talk:Yongle the Great
On your request
[edit]Hello Yongle the Great/Trương Hoàng Phong. Unfortunately I can't open the file you gave me! And I have never uploaded an image to Wikipedia before, so I'm afraid I can't help you on this one. But you could ask somebody else with a message like this: "Hello. I find this file very interesting [add link], but I don't know how to upload it to Wikimedia. Could you help me, please?" Some users are always happy to help newcomers. I suggest you contact Coppertwig, who has been a great mentor to many Wikipedia editors. Good luck! Madalibi (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Zhu Gaoxu, Prince of Han
[edit]Just a reminder that all articles must be referenced. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 00:07, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I am not quite understanding
[edit]I received the quest you sent, asking me for help with translation. But where is the site you want me to put the translations at? Since there is already a page about Yongle, why would you want me to translate them? I am confused. You are in control 14:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the articles created by this editor, but unless a source can be found that a general with this name in English existed I'll have to take it to AfD for a deletion discussion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 06:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Kingdom of Da Zhou. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Needham and other academic sources use Kingdom of Da Zhou, not Dazhou. As this seems to be the common English name, and you are not using edit summaries, I'll be moving this back and give my sources on the talk page Dougweller (talk) 06:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Kingdom of Da Zhou
[edit]When I made the move the first time I gave an explanation in the edit summary. I've made it again and used the talk page to explain why 'Da Zhou' is in accord with our guidelines on naming articles. If you want to move it back, please justify the move on the article talk page.
And please start using edit summaries to explain your edits. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion of you at the Administrators' Notice Board (incidents)
[edit]As you are continuing to revert my move without discussion and are creating articles such as Factory Guards (factory is normally used to describe a building where things are made, and many of them have guards), and have continued not to use edit summaries or talk pages, I have started a discussion about your actions here. [1]. Or you can click on the link in the notice I'm adding below and scroll down to the section "How do others deal with unresponsive editors".
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#How_do_others_deal_with_unresponsive_editors.3F Dougweller (talk) 06:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Government of the Ming Dynasty. Firstly thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic one which we already have a page - [[:{{{article}}}]]. Your enthusiasm is fantastic, but unfortunately your article has been nominated for deletion in accordance with our policies. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we'd love for you to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]] - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest this deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article you created (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on Talk:Government of the Ming Dynasty explaining your position, although an administrator may still believe deletion to be necessary. Regardless, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, as doing such often creates unnecessary confusion. If you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Hang in there and try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.
♪ daTheisen(talk) 09:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Unresponsiveness
[edit]Further to the above-linked ANI thread, you should be aware that we expect all editors to engage with their peers. This means replying to their concerns, discussing edits when necessary on article- and user-talk pages, using edit-summaries, and generally making it easy for other editors to understand why you've done what you've done. This is absolutely fundamental to the collaborative process of building Wikipedia, and editors who continually fail to communicate in a meaningful way are eventually blocked. EyeSerenetalk 18:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violation at Wudangshan Zixiao Palace
[edit]Your text was a direct copy from the first link. I've improved it and added a reference. Since all the sources seem to call it simply the Zixiao Palace I will be moving it to that title. If you disagree, please discuss it, don't simply revert. I've also turned two articles with virtually no content into redirects to their main articles. Again, I'm asking you either to leave them as they are or ask for an explanation and discuss it. Thanks. (It would also be a good idea for you to create your articles in your user space so that you can add references, it is not a good idea to create unreferenced articles). Dougweller (talk) 12:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]Because you haven't responded to the concerns raised above—either here, on the ANI thread, or with individual editors—I've blocked your account for 24 hours in the hopes of getting your attention. This is very much a final chance for you to satisfactorily address the issues other editors have with some of your editing. This revert of a legitimate redirect, again without attempting discussion, indicates you are unwilling to abide by our policies, and the copyright violation pointed out by Dougweller is a very serious matter that could have legal consequences for Wikipedia. As I wrote in my earlier post, building Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and communication is a non-negotiable foundation of this.
If you would like to contest this block, you can use the {{unblock}} template to request an independent review. EyeSerenetalk 18:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Increased to indef
[edit]Still no response, so in case you simply haven't been online I've increased the block's duration to indefinite to make absolutely sure you can't miss it. EyeSerenetalk 21:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Template:History of the Ming Dynasty has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 18:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Block evasion
[edit]You've been using other accounts to continue editing without addressing the reasons why this one was blocked. Block evasion is a really bad idea if you want to be taken seriously, it's against Wikipedia policy, and needs to stop. All other accounts you create will be blocked on sight and every edit made using them will be removed, unless you start to discuss the issues brought up above. You can use the {{unblock}} template or just post to this page. We want to resolve this, but at the moment you are not helping yourself. EyeSerenetalk 12:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hong-Wu the Great for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Regancy42 (talk) 23:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14 Blades for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. _LDS (talk) 05:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhou dynasty for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. _LDS (talk) 05:04, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Prince of Yan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Created by a suspected sockpuppet of blocked User:Yongle the Great
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _LDS (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Tianwan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Created by a suspected sockpuppet of blocked User:Yongle the Great
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _LDS (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
The article Chen Han has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Created and edited by a suspected sockpuppet of blocked User:Yongle the Great
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _LDS (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/First Sovereign Qin Emperor for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. _LDS (talk) 04:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Ming-eunuch1.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Ming-eunuch1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Ming-eunuch2.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Ming-eunuch2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Wuzong of Ming.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Wuzong of Ming.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Liu Ji.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Liu Ji.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Yuan Chonghuan.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Yuan Chonghuan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Zhu Biao and Empress Ma.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Zhu Biao and Empress Ma.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Li Wenzhong.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Li Wenzhong.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:31, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wuxinghongqi05 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 03:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/洪武帝 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 01:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter I the Great for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/義勇軍進行曲 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 10:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Villa Villekulla for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 05:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dieu et mon droit for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 05:26, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Levin Zhang for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/113.161.226.163 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 04:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Võ Trường Trà My for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 04:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prince of Yan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 15:32, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/历史研究 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 15:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Bronze Horseman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 13:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JYW 2010 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 暗無天日 contact me (聯絡) 09:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yongle the Great for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 
HXL's Roundtable, and Record 05:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ming Dynasty's Northern Expeditions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:List of Chinese monarchs (Ming dynasty)
[edit]
Template:List of Chinese monarchs (Ming dynasty) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Wuzong of Ming.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Wuzong of Ming.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Wuzong of Ming.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by c:File:Ming Wuzong.jpg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
"Yongle (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yongle (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Yongle (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)