User talk:Yomommahog
November 2010
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Philip Byrne, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Philip Byrne was changed by Yomommahog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889659 on 2010-11-18T15:33:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Debtors' prison constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant (using semi-automated tool) Report Mistake 15:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mud volcano, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Mud volcano was changed by Yomommahog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.837841 on 2010-11-19T15:31:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Scholarship, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Scholarship was changed by Yomommahog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941447 on 2010-11-19T15:39:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Blake Spier
[edit]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Blake Spier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Salih (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
