User talk:Yhesum

January 2016

Hello, I'm Mike1901. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sadiq Khan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mike1901 (talk) 13:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphabetum Romanum (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

Could be notable but see WP:Referencing for beginners and also add any further available amount of in-depth sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alphabetum Romanum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alphabetum Romanum has been accepted

Alphabetum Romanum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe decker ^talk 01:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello. You are engaged in an WP:EDIT WAR at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. Please stop edit warring. Instead, use the Talk page to discuss your proposal, and then follow the WP:CONSENSUS there. Thank you. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yhesum, this is a collaborative editing project. You cannot simply revert other editors. If you do, you may be blocked from editing. If you make a change, and another editor reverts you, then do not simply revert them back. Instead, follow the WP:BRD process and go to the article's Talk page to explain why a change should be made. Then, follow the discussion and wait for a WP:CONSENSUS to develop, or agreement to be reached, before reverting back. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your contributions to Talk pages by adding four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically sign your user name, time and date. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd underscore what Ssilvers says, above. You risk being blocked from editing if you do not follow Wikipedia's rules, the relevant of which are concisely set out, above. Tim riley talk 08:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmy Failla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jimmy Failla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Failla. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi. We don't accept unsourced articles. Please don't repeat that mistake as any such articles will be immediately deleted. Deb (talk) 11:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]