User talk:Yewhock

This user may have left Wikipedia. Yewhock has not edited Wikipedia since 14 August 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello, Yewhock! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 15:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Internal links

Hi there! I just wanted to let you know about an issue with one of your edits to Tibet sovereignty debate. According to Wikipedia policy on internal links, links to the same article should not be put into the same section and an article should only be linked twice from another if that article is particularly long (in case the reader skipped the part where it was linked earlier). This is DEFINITELY not a problem or criticism; just something to keep in mind for future editing. Cheers, Gimme danger (talk) 07:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Preamble

Hello you put a lot of text into Seventeen Point Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet. It may be a good idea to copy the entire treaty to Wikisource instead. Wikipedia articles are not for displaying the full treaty. Benjwong (talk) 04:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ETIM

Thank you for re-adding all those unexplained removes. [User:KappaD] moved over 1,000 bytes of RS, including Refs from Times.com, Washington Post, Newsline.com and People's Daily. I will keep an eye on the entry as well. Thank you again. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Users Yewhock and TheAsianGURU keep adding PRC propaganda to this article. These users are welcome to edit Baidu Baike, but propaganda is not welcomed at Wikipedia. - KappaD (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet

I see you added some background about Webster Tarpley's ideas about Tibet to his page. I think it is POV-laden material and would ask that you take a look at it and consider rewriting it in a more evenhanded manner.Njsamizdat (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009 Ürümqi riots‎

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on July 2009 Ürümqi riots. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

There is a reason we have talk pages. Use them. rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Yewhock_reported_by_User:Seb_az86556_.28Result:_.29

This is to inform you that you have been reported for edit-warring. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at July 2009 Ürümqi riots‎. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Yewhock reported by User:Seb az86556 and User:Rjanag (Result: 31h). EdJohnston (talk) 13:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Tibetan naming conventions

A while back, I posted a new proposal for Tibetan naming conventions, i.e. conventions that can be used to determine the most appropriate titles for articles related to the Tibetan region. This came out of discussions about article titles on Talk:Qamdo and Talk:Lhoka (Shannan) Prefecture. I hope that discussions on the proposal's talk page will lead to consensus in favour of making these conventions official, but so far only a few editors have left comments. If you would be interested in taking a look at the proposed naming conventions and giving your opinion, I would definitely appreciate it. Thanks—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 16:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]