User talk:Yesness89

Welcome

Hello, Yesness89, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Yesness89's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro Football Retired Players Association (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Interstellarity was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Interstellarity (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yesness89! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Interstellarity (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro Football Retired Players Association (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pro Football Retired Players Association (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pro Football Retired Players Association instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare this draft with the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pro Football Retired Players Association, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PFRPA Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PFRPA Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Pro Football Retired Players Association. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE BLOCK OR REMOVAL OF THE PAGE....— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yessness89 (talk • contribs)

By creating this account and editing with it you evaded the block on your prior account, User:Pro Football Retired Players Association. You were told that you would not be unblocked to edit about your association. 331dot (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand. Can the article be restored and I just allow someone else to edit it to improve the article?

Edits by blocked editors are not allowed to stand, as it would defeat the purpose of the block to allow them. When an independent editor takes note of your association after seeing significant coverage of it in an independent reliable source, it will be written about. You are free to appeal the block as described above, and any appeal will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, if I'm unblocked, can I write about this same topic?

In the short term, no. If you are interested in being a general contributor and want to edit about subjects unrelated to your conflict of interest, you might later be permitted to write and submit a draft about the Association for review- probably at least six months if not a year. If you are just here to represent the Association, there is in my opinion no pathway to being unblocked for you. 331dot (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, well can the page that says that is has been removed be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yesness89 (talk • contribs) 19:49, March 27, 2020 (UTC)

No, it is not technically possible to do so. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What if someone else writes about the Association? Will it still be there? 331dot

Pings do not work unless you sign your talk page posts with four tildes like this: ~~~~. Yes, if someone else independent of the association writes about it based on significant coverage in independent reliable sources, it will remain. 20:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yesness89 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know all of the rules, nor did I understand how to create an article that does not sound like an advertisement. This is my first-ever experience working with anything Wikipedia-related, and I thought it was much simpler. I will not violate the rules again. I do, however, still have lots of questions.

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your violation of WP:SOCK or WP:EVADE, nor your continued violation of WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.