User talk:Yash Pal Rao

June 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ibibo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ibibo was changed by Yash Pal Rao (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854879 on 2014-06-24T12:51:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yash Pal Rao. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yash Pal Rao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I have been blocked indefinite? Yash Pal Rao (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's explained in the block message, above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yash Pal Rao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is a very old account and the allegations are false. I never created these accounts and the block was for 3 days from 27 March 2017 but account is still blocked. Yash Pal Rao (talk) 09:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's quite unambiguous. Any checkuser would look at your results and immediately conclude "Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts". --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 13:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ah yes, I see. You were subsequently indefinitely blocked on April 23 as a result of checkuser investigation, as can be seen in your block log at https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3AYash+Pal+Rao. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but since I am genuine and old user, how can I resolve this? There is no mal-intent and I did not create multiple accounts at all. Yash Pal Rao (talk)

First thing is to ask the blocking checkuser. @Bbb23: Can you offer any more information here? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Please check and suggest what all information I can provide. (Yash Pal Rao (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]

I can't speak for Bbb23, but it looks like he reblocked this account because InCredNitin (talk · contribs) was recently created, and started editing the same article, from the same IP address that Yash Pal Rao uses. —DoRD (talk) 11:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:, @DoRD: This might be due to proxy of my internet service provider(ISP). What should I do now? I am just a single user from my end, please guide me to avoid multiple/duplicate users. Should I change my ISP? (Yash Pal Rao (talk) 11:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]

I have nothing to add. As others have already said, it's obvious. I have no reason to believe you and certainly no reason to unblock you.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:00, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23:, @Jpgordon:, I am well-acquainted with wiki policy and rules. Why would I lead myself to blocking? That too when I am an old account and blocked already once. It is simple reasoning. It's highly unfortunate. (Yash Pal Rao (talk) 04:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]