User talk:YashPratap1912
YashPratap1912, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi YashPratap1912! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC) |
Welcome
[edit]
|
June 2020
[edit]Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of Borg 03:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Help Desk
[edit]Hi YashPratap1912,
I see you recently visited the Wikipedia Help Desk to try and get some assistance for your draft. Unfortunately you were unsuccessful in obtaining assistance.
Please be aware that the help desk is manned by volunteers who have no obligation to answer your query, therefore you were just unlucky that nobody was around at the time.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 11:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi YashPratap1912! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Disambiguation pages with links
[edit]Hello, YashPratap1912. Before you edit Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links/July 2020, please take a moment to read the note at the top of the page, and do not alter the content of any line that you move to the "Done" section. Thanks! --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hello R'n'B, actually I am a new editor and that′s why I didn't know that. I will make sure not to repeat this mistake. By the way, were my disambiguation correct?YashPratap1912 (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]Hey! I know you helped me build the AKINGS wikipedia page and now it is up for speedy deletion. Can you contest against that for me?
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/AKINGS CMFong2 (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC) |
- CMFong2 Thanks, but I cannot do that because it will be treated as WP:CANVASSING
I hope you understand--YashPratap1912 (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- CMFong2 Thanks, but I cannot do that because it will be treated as WP:CANVASSING
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi YashPratap1912! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Disambiguation pages with links count
[edit]There should never be a reason for you to change the total number of links that existed at the start of the month, as you did here. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 16:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh I am really sorry R'n'B , I updated the total count instead of completion count.YashPratap1912(CONT.) 17:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Page protection
[edit]Hello! Thanks for asking for page protection for Republic Bharat TV at WP:RFPP. Your request has been declined and I wanted to explain why :) Semi-page protection is meant for pages experiencing high or persistent levels of vandalism, which this page just wasn't. All pages experience some vandalism, from the smallest to the largest, but we don't want to shut out valuable new editors. A large portion of constructive edits are still made by IP's and new users, so we try to use page protection as sparingly as possible. Generally, if a page has had much recent disruption (at least 3 vandalisms not all by the same user is a good rule of thumb) within the last day, or persistent disruption over the course of a week, then semi-protection might be warranted. Sometimes protection for disruption over a longer scale is warranted, but it needs to really be persistent and troublesome. Hopefully that helps explain our protection policy a little better! Don't be afraid to submit pages for protection though if you think they need it, better safe than sorry, and an admin can always make the final call. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Cwmhiraeth. I understand it. No problem, I will just be more careful about requesting the page protection from the next time. Thanks for your response.--YashPratap1912(CONT.) 12:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)