Jump to content

User talk:Yankeesrj12/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

RE: Notes from the Underbelly ratings

I've just got your message regarding the Notes from the Underbelly ratings. I'd just like to say that 30 Rock doesnt have it on another page. --Jamie jca 19:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay, i'll move then to the episode list. But, i'll keep the seasonals were they are. -- Jamie jca 01:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I was checking the license information on the image and was about to tag it as a copyright infringement as the source is not wikipedia but the licensing information said it was a screenshot of a wikipedia web page. I saw that you uploaded it and just want to give you a chance to fix the licensing to be more accurate as it is actually a Disney copyrighted image only allowed under fair use. It also needs a fair use rational to use it in the Wizards of Waverly Place episode article. --NrDg 05:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I took care of it. It just required some templates to be added to the page. If you edit the page you can see what I did. --NrDg 06:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

RE: 2007-2008 Midseason

That sounds like a good idea to me. I was unsure of putting it up now. Do you want to or me?♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You can do it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 01:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

12 PM Airing of I Love New York 2

As with every Flavor of Love spinoff, there are two separate airings. One at 12/11 Central, and one at 10/9 Central. It is usually updated at the 12/11 airing. It has been like that for every spinoff. If you don't want to be spoiled, then don't look at the article. Trevor "Tinkleheimer" Haworth 23:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

It's been done this way with every Flavor of Love spin-off, why change? I think further discussion should be on the ILNY2 Talk Page. 02:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinkleheimer (talkcontribs)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shrek-the-Hallsb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shrek-the-Hallsb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit war at Journeyman page

Please don't edit war on the page. Your point is understood, and can be expressed on the talk page. It is disruptive to continue to remove the text when a discussion is under way. (You're also approaching revert guideline problems.) Thank you. --Ckatzchatspy 20:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Shrek-the-Hallsb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Shrek-the-Hallsb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CW Now.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

the image

This image does not have information on its copyright status so please add an appropriate license. feydey (talk) 23:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please Refrain from Vandalism of Wiki pages please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.38.213 (talk) 16:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please refrain from removing referenced material from wiki pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.241.46.108 (talk) 20:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You will be blocked

If you continue to Vandalise sourced content on other people's Wiki pages such as you did to the "I Love New York" page you shall be blocked. 128.241.46.108 (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I can see that you are new to Wiki, However you will be banned if you continue further vandalism of other people's wiki pages. Maybe you can contribute to some pages which you have knowledge on as you have not contributed anything to OUR "I Love New York" page. Please and thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.241.46.108 (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

The IP can not block you or ban you. I've replied on my talk page to your comment there. -- Flyguy649 talk 06:02, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I Love New York page

Why are you messing with all the referenced material on the "I Love New York" page? I myself have went to all the reference links and it was all in order but when I come back to the page it shows that you continue to mess up that section. Can you please stop. 66.19.160.3 (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Messing up Wikipedia sections

I'm with everyone else when saying you have messed up the ILNY's cast bio section. 207.195.247.235 (talk) 05:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry involving harrassment on your account

I'm under the impression that all of the accounts that have been harrassing you on you talk page are being operated by the same user, all of them are working as single purpouse accounts and all of them appear subsecuent to the block of the previous one, at the very least they are meatpuppets of the original account, I recomend that you inform me of further accounts in order to prevent further harrassment. - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm an administrator and have been blocking the accounts as they pop up but some of them might go unnoticed. - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I have seen the edit pattern of this user on other article before, he will try to draw other users into edit warring if the articles they edit aren't kept as he wants (wich more often than not is composed or removing of material and addition of unsourced one) be cautious not to fall in this trick. - Caribbean~H.Q. 06:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me, I am just a I Love New York fan, So please do not spread lies. I come to the I Love New York page several times along with other fans and noticed uncalled for changes taking place and apprently have the same thought as some other users. I have not even edited the page, I have only clicked on the reference links and found them to be correct with the info that keeps getting deleted ( also any fan of the show knows most of the info to be facts about the cast). If you want to see info that does not belong then you should edit the surreal life and Flavor of Love since they are different shows. Maybe people should do research before removing info that goes with the show, I would not do it so other people should not do it either. Thanks, the I Love New York fans. 63.215.29.133 (talk) 07:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

By now you must be tired of all this random accounts harrassing you, do you want me to semi-protect this talk page for some time? - Caribbean~H.Q. 16:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wizards.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wizards.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cw now.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, what makes you feel that “the other version IS MUCH BETTER”? In my opinion, being collapsible (having the hide/show link), immediately editable (the v·d·e links), having ndashes between numbers and using {{·}} instead of a lot of nbsp, and horizontal alignment of the years are all positive things. –Fred Bradstadt (talk) 06:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I hope I got it right this time :-) Otherwise, please let me know. –Fred Bradstadt (talk) 20:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)