User talk:Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa
Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC) |
May 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Seraphimblade. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Hero Alom, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:16, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Ts12rAc. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to PN MILGEM project class corvette—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Ts12rActalk to me 07:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
For your kind information t300 can fire both 230 and 300 mm and then munitions are called trg300 300mm and trg 230 230mm.Bangladesh has bought t300 mlrs system according to rocketsan but it didn't specify that only Mehedi099 (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Mehedi099 Where did you find out? It is unreasonable to buy the same vehicles for two types of rockets. If Bangladesh had two systems then Bangladesh Army would be used more vehicles even those are same model vehicles. No reference or image available for TRG-230.Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Check out form Turkish defense pages and rocketsans website,by changing the canisters the t300 system can fire both TRG230 and trg300 from the same launching vehicle Mehedi099 (talk) 10:32, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Mehedi099 I am aware of that the same system (the vehicle and electronics) has the ability to launch both of the MLRS. But it is unreasonable to buy the same vehicles for two types of rockets. If Bangladesh Army bought TRG-230 then they would be used more vehicles of this type. Without this it is impossible to use both types of the MLRS at the same time. If you want to add TRG-230 you have to provide reference. Not from kids run Facebook page or YouTube channel. Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 10:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Mehedi099 Roketsan MULTI-CALIBER LAUNCHER WEAPON SYSTEM (MCL) is not only able to launch TRG-300 or TRG-230 but also able to launch TR-122, TRB-122, TRG-122, KHAN rockets and missiles. So you need to add all of these to Bangladesh Army inventory not only TRG-230 in this regard. You must be rational. Link https://www.roketsan.com.tr/en/product/mcl-multi-caliber-launcher-weapon-system/ Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 (warning)
[edit]Hai @Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa: greetings, Consider this as a warning, you've broken 3RR rule and entered into edit war. Please refrain from reverting logical content, which have citation to back up, also I've explained the reason for its inclusion, in talk section here https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Sixth-generation_fighter#Indian_so_called_%22sixth-generation_fighter_program%22. A further violation could land you into an account ban —Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Echo1Charlie My last message to you here. I have my personal works to do. Why India would run 5th and 6th generation fighter program at a same time? You are the man who is responsible for spreading rumors in Indian miliitary fan community. The mixture of truth and falsehood has taken shape in your nature. Time will prove that I was right. Yamato Bismarck Hood Iowa (talk) 16:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm glad that you got the point :) Have a nice day —Echo1Charlie (talk) 16:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.