User talk:YODAFON~enwiki

The article The Forrum of Citizens that doesn't permit the privilleges of Koreans in Japan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 14:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Kazuma Arai and Doronpa. NawlinWiki 14:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with The Meeting of The Citizens who Demand The Full Withdrawal of Kono Statement. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. SMC89 14:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Religious persecution by Muslims

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Religious persecution by Muslims, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. NeilN 05:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've deleted the page for its improper tone. It read very much like an attack page. Pascal.Tesson 05:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with "improper tone", but you should go to deletion review since the same page, more or less, was deleted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical persecution by Muslims (2nd nomination). gren グレン 06:48, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

En-3

After seeing (And deleting) your "Criticism" section on the Joshua page, I'd say you can speak intermediate English at best.

No insult intended, but Advanced English speakers can at least make themselves appear native in text. You cannot. PaZuZu 11:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Joshua. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. -- Avi 18:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 29 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Carter | Talk it up 07:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 29 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Carter | Talk it up 07:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ⅰ'm not vandalizing the page! Your claim is highly based on your POV.YODAFON 07:10, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And just what is my POV?

I'm not vandalizing Wikipedia!

I just said that Virgin-birth is scientifically impossible and it should be noted in the article of Jesus.Please do not stand on Christian POV,wikipedia is not only for Christians.YODAFON 07:30, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's not for Christians, nor am I standing on those principles. I highly encourage you to not engage in WP:ATTACK. I'm stating that while it is not scientifically possible, it doesn't belong on the page.Carter | Talk it up 07:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Cherem (genocide)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Cherem (genocide) meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherem (genocide). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. IZAK 09:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Maverik! :D

Dear friend, I'm rather glad you've stirred the waters in a few places, please keep helping Wiki refine its processes for handling controversy. From what I can see, you are getting a feel for how Wiki works. We are not perfect.

On two issues you have raised.

Herem: I wrote a thesis on this topic. It is fascinating (but unpopular). Personally, I love Jewish people, AND the Bible. Managing both things at once in a public forum can be tricky. I don't have time to write up everything, but we can all work together, sometimes we have to slow down to get on board with one another and be sure of the facts.
Virgin Birth: I am a Christian, as such, I'm happy to conceed that the VB had to be a miracle. In fact, there's a very interesting medical analysis of the VB. Virgin births are not impossible. There are documented cases ... electricity can do strange things to a woman who is ovulating. The issue is, when a child is conceived without a father, there is no Y chromosome and the child will be female. Jesus was male, so either a man was involved, or it was a miracle. The naive belief that virgins can't have babies is actually false. So how about that! I think that's worth putting in the "Christian" virgin birth article, and I'm a Christian.

Friend, have fun at Wiki. Document surprising facts and people will love you. If you have a taste for it, enjoy being able to give unquestionable documentation for things people just won't believe. Write up stuff from the TV show Mythbusters for example.

Anyway, hope you feel my respect for your keen mind, and encouragement for you to keep contributing. But I'm also asking that you be a little more gentle. There's a whole bunch of bees flying around wanting to sting, cause people don't know how to cope with you. Congratulations, I'm impressed. ;)

Peace. Alastair Haines 02:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello YODAFON! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Sharin Yamano - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Makoto Sakurai - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called YODAFON. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name YODAFON~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

03:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

20:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC)