User talk:65HCA7

Archives

2015 2016 2017

RFA

Hi, Apologies for removing part of your !vote - Obviously that was unintentional, I've had to remove the indents tho as your indents were causing my note to be counted as a !vote, That's one drawback to the RFA process the indents!, Anyway happy editing, –Davey2010^Talk 22:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Davey2010: No worries; I understand completely. Those indents can be very frustrating sometimes! Have a great rest of your night! :) 65 HC A7 22:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Swarm ♠ 05:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a false alarm I apologize in advance, but I could not come up with any alternative explanation as to why a perfectly constructive vandal fighter in good standing would commit straightforward vandalism within an otherwise-acceptable reversion, as this account did here. This situation needs to be clarified, as it appears your account has been compromised by a vandal. Swarm ♠ 05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

65HCA7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Swarm: I am indeed the person who made that edit; I was not intentionally trying to vandalise or anything, just revert the improper edit the prior user had made. The reason for the "snake people" replacement was purely the result of a browser extension (I have an extension that changes "millennials" in pages to "snake people", and did not know until just now that it replaced text in dialog boxes too); it was completely accidental and unintentional, in addition to not being the kind of thing I as a good-faith editor in good standing would even think of doing intentionally. I have uninstalled the extension, deeply regret the error, understand what happened, and promise that it will never happen again. 65 HC A7 11:04, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Without further ado, accepting this unblock request after reasonable explanation; this kind of text-replacing extension incident does happen sometimes. Alex Shih (talk) 12:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih: Thank you very much; have a great rest of your day! 65 HC A7 12:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Upon hearing your explanation, I think the situation is hilarious, one of the funniest unintentional errors I've witnessed here. My sincere apologies for blocking your account, I hope there are no hard feelings. Best regards, Swarm ♠ 17:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks to Alex for taking care of the unblock very quickly. Swarm ♠ 17:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Swarm: Don't worry about it - stuff happens all the time, and many users I look up to around here have stuff in their block log too. Glad to see you got humour out of this incident. :D No hard feelings whatsoever. Cheers! 65 HC A7 20:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 May 2018

Where exactly should I send a message 65HCA7? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BalancedViewoncancer (talk • contribs) 23:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BalancedViewoncancer: I moved your comment to a new section at the bottom of the page per the talk page guidelines. Feel free to post any questions, comments, or concerns below this comment here or in a new section.

Cheers! 65 HC A7 22:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to add (since I didn't see this before I made my original comment): the discussion on the neutral point of view noticeboard seems to sum up the appropriateness of your situation perfectly; other users were able to explain things in even more detail than I was, and as such I think we're done here. 65 HC A7 22:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Kane Tanaka

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 12:28, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 65HCA7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 65HCA7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]