User talk:BalancedViewoncancer

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Max Gerson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Max Gerson was changed by BalancedViewoncancer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866885 on 2018-05-02T21:58:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm 65HCA7, a fellow Wikipedian who noticed your recent edits to Max Gerson. Your story is certainly interesting, and you bring up some valid points. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal blog or soapbox, meaning such stories are best suited elsewhere. Objective additions of content with reliable sources, however, are allowed and encouraged. If you have any questions, please let me know at my user talk.

Thank you,

65HCA7 22:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Max Gerson, you may be blocked from editing. Roxy, the dog. barcus 22:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

BalancedViewoncancer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BalancedViewoncancer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)