User talk:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1
| Name of student reviewer * | Wikipedia User:SRampersaud |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/8/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/8/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/8/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Not needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | N/A |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | relevant to I/O Psych topic and accurate information. |
| Wikiformatting | |
| Grammar & composition | None |
| Other comments | Good Job |
...............................
| Name of student reviewer * | Wikipedia User:M.Caban |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/7/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/7/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/7/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | N/A |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article information was relevant to I/O Psych topic and added information was accurate. |
| Wikiformatting | Good on bold letters. |
| Grammar & composition | None found |
| Other comments | very good job |
Pre-Edit Peer Review
[edit]| Name of student reviewer ** | Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/8/2013 |
| Name of editor | Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/8/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/8/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | N/A |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Interesting, informative |
| Wikiformatting | Nice formatting |
| Grammar & composition | Well done |
| Other comments | Well done |
| Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User:DJames5 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/8/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/8/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/8/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Not needed |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | N/A |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | Yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | Accurate |
| Wikiformatting | Good |
| Grammar & composition | None |
| Other comments | None |
| Reviewer's Signature | DJames5 (talk) 18:19, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
| Name of student reviewer * | Wikipedia User:CRamel16 |
|---|---|
| Date of review | 5/9/2013 |
| Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** | Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253 |
| URL of editor’s Userpage | http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/edit1 |
| Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page | 5/9/2013 |
| Date review submitted to instructor | 5/9/2013 |
| Length of edit (too long/too short) | Good length |
| Image (needed/appropriate) | Image not needed. |
| Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) | N/A |
| Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed | yes |
| Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) | The article information was relevant to the topic and added information was accurate. |
| Wikiformatting | Good, but no numbers/bullets added. |
| Grammar & composition | Not found |
| Other comments | good job |