User talk:Xtrasalty111111

File source problem with File:Wkboss son.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Wkboss son.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Working White English Bulldog Association

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Working White English Bulldog Association, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wweba.com/WWEBA/main.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:19, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Working White English Bulldog Association

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Working White English Bulldog Association, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wweba.com/. As a copyright violation, Working White English Bulldog Association appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Working White English Bulldog Association has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Working White English Bulldog Association and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Working White English Bulldog Association with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Working White English Bulldog Association.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 11:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of permission but still deleted

Hi there. In case you wondered why I deleted Working White English Bulldog Association despite your claim of having permission, I wanted to leave you this message. Unfortunately, anyone can claim to have permission, so you would have to forward permission to our OTRS system before adding copyrighted text. Before you consider doing so, remember that this text is naturally promotional and thus would be unfit to be included into Wikipedia even if it could be used (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view). Also, there is no indication that this organisation is in any way important or significant and thus would also fail our relevant notability guidelines and be deleted. You are encouraged to continue editing Wikipedia of course but before creating a new article, please read Wikipedia:Your first article first. Also, you can use the help desk in case you have problems or place {{helpme}} with your question(s) on this page. Regards So Why 12:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I will look into this Xtrasalty111111 (talk) 12:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Working White English Bulldog Association (emblem).gif

The file File:Working White English Bulldog Association (emblem).gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 21:09, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]