User talk:XtraT

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

X Factor 2011

Hi, there is a discussion about why the judges houses performances are not included on the talk page, so please discuss there instead of reverting. Thanks. --MSalmon (talk) 18:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pease STOP reverting the article without discussing it on the talk page. --MSalmon (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, discuss the issue like a mature person. --ShimmeringScarab (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that the formatting for the current X Factor series should be consistent with the articles of previous series. Try to avoid making edits without giving any explanation, and use the talk page rather than reinstate your changes after they're reverted. Teppic74 (talk) 22:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding what the acts sang at judges houses, we try to be consistent with previous years see The X Factor (UK Series 6) and The X Factor (UK Series 7), They don't include what songs were sang at judges houses. You have been told many times to stop adding the information. Thank You Fatty2k10 (talk) 09:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on The X Factor (UK series 8). Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

You can not move pages without other people agreeing with you. ----Bruvtakesover (talk!) 19:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. You should not have moved the page Cheryl so that you could redirect it to Cheryl Cole without a discussion on the talk page of both articles first. Had you done so you would have seen that the issue of her name has been discussed at length, and since she is one of many women named Cheryl, we should not make a special case for her. Paul MacDermott (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, XtraT. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of The Voice of Ireland finalists (series 1) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Voice of Ireland finalists (series 1) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Voice of Ireland finalists (series 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]